A new owner accused of using the Vault cover too much at delivery.
Lmao…. You can’t make this crap up lol
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A new owner accused of using the Vault cover too much at delivery.
Someone forgot rivian’s 2yr powered cover drama.Lmao…. You can’t make this crap up lol
"would" or "should"?More Utility than a Truck? What Truck is he talking about?
"
404: cosplay not found.
Even power window motors will overheat from excessive use. Go ahead, run yours back and forth until they stop.Lmao…. You can’t make this crap up lol
Not sure if you've ever used an F150 with tow assist, but it makes it fool proof. I still use the side mirrors, just not the rearview.idk I've driven trucks long before back up cameras were a thing, they're exceptionally useful for checking the rear blind spot directly behind the vehicle, but while actually backing I'm generally watching my side mirrors more than the camera or rearview. And of course, useless with a trailer.
The backup assist? I have it on my newer f150, I never use it tbh.Not sure if you've ever used an F150 with tow assist, but it makes it fool proof. I still use the side mirrors, just not the rearview.
Still, when towing or driving and backing in, I almost never use the rearview mirror
Looks liKe Rivian is still King
The “Brand New” CT is right on par with the 3 year old Lightning, and behind the 4 year old Rivian…. Tesla should be ashamed…
something to keep in mind, is that there is so much of the software with Cybertruck that is not even out yet. When i got my first Model 3 in 2017, it was a night and day difference after about a year when the firmware was heavily updated. Since i have gotten my Cybertruck, there has already been a significant amount of improvements with driving, handling, and charging. This entire thing is net new in many ways for Tesla, so the firmware to adapt to these net new components are still underway. Reviews could be different once the firmware is caught up, which is likely when we move out of the "foundation" series and into general production.
All of the automakers are doing the same, practically every major EV release have had software issues (or even serious hardware issues). It's pretty much the way forward now in order to get cars out quickly.Some of us are tired of the "wait for the software update"
For a startup it's o.k., for the leader in EV's, putting out an unfinished product is insane.
All of the automakers are doing the same, practically every major EV release have had software issues (or even serious hardware issues). It's pretty much the way forward now in order to get cars out quickly.
I would prefer a product that can get better over time vs getting stuck with what you get when you take delivery. Now that many other automakers are moving towards OTA and stepping up their chops with software development, i think this new norm.Some of us are tired of the "wait for the software update"
For a startup it's o.k., for the leader in EV's, putting out an unfinished product is insane.
Not true at all, Tesla has been trashed also in the media. Just look at the Jalopnik articles on the Cybertruck:The problem is only Tesla gets the positive spin. Fisher was ripped recently for their trash software.....
MKBHD says the Fisker Ocean is the 'worst car' he's ever reviewed
Marques Brownlee calls the Fisker Ocean the "worst car he's ever reviewed," even despite a few good things about it.www.teslarati.com
This practice needs to stop. I understand software to improve on certain things or add entertainment options. However, missing FSD, AP, Lockers, etc etc is unacceptable.