Realistically, alternatives to fossil fuels were a big stretch 40 years ago. Technologies, starting with toxic Pb-A (Lead Acid) and Nickle Cadmium batteries, coupled with expensive and low-performance solar cells made EVs very limited. Transition at that time would have collapsed the economy of the world. Sure we could have moved faster after the EV1 showed viability 30 years ago but 40 is a bit of a stretch.
Unfortunately, the human race is currently not prepared to produce enough EVs or make them cheaply. Tesla is on about as fast a curve as realistically possible to get to that point. Sure, the process would accelerate a bit if anyone else was seriously trying but complaining won't help either. Tesla clobbering the ICE industry as no industry has ever been hit before is helping but the other 99.999% of the world is doing essentially nothing. If you know other ways to enable or motivate them, I'm all ears.
I do, however, believe that the misguided efforts to ham-fistedly outlaw ICE in the developed world in a decade are a horrible idea. It's too late to do any good and will only cause pushback from those in power, delaying things further. We can be there in less time if we continue to let Tesla lead the way, forcing the others to follow or die as the people vote with their purses.
@ Earl: Thank you for your comments but :
"but the other 99.999% of the world is doing essentially nothing."
EVs by country:
Electric car use by country - Wikipedia
2021:
China: 7.8 M
Europe: 5.7M
USA: 3.3M
So, we're at the back of the pack. BTW I have seen figures that China continued accelerating EV adoption up to today despite removal of incentives. (USA definitely increasing but still at the back of the pack.)
To put this in perspective: Norway, 28% of all cars in use are EVs in 2021. Why are we a bunch of losers compared to Norway?
To put this in perspective, compared to what we should be doing: If we got into a war with any significant country, what would be the yr-on-yr increase in bomb production? This is the kind of thinking we *should* be applying to climate change, to EV (and chargers) and Green energy production, because saving our climate will be ***worth it***.
I find your assertion that it is "misguided to outlaw ICE cars" may be wise, If I were emperor I would surely outlaw new ones tomorrow, but without an emperor that may have problems, backlashes, etc. etc.
I find your openness to other ways of convincing people is very constructive.
I think the idea of making this positive, and trying to get people to look forward to the economic growth of a "green jobs revolution" is sensible from a political point of view. (Even conservatives love that it gets a factory in their state.) However, I think what we really need to do at this point is "all of the above": let's continue to incentivize any efficient non-fossil anything everywhere, let's start taxing carbon (killing new ices by making them expensive), taxing ice companies, taxing fossil fuels, and using tax revenues for green energy (and for efficiency, e.g. insulation, which is always the best thing to do in any energy analysis). Let's help people below median income buy new stuff that is efficient.
There is so much we COULD do that we're not doing. To all the nay-sayers on this thread I will always come back with, "Why not? Isn't the earth worth it?"
-TPC