You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Long time lurker here.
Bloomberg TV had a 5 minute debate between an auto dealer lobbyist and a UM economics professor who has been working to undo all the state-level franchise defending laws and regs.
The auto dealer lobbyist made two statements that the UM professor had a field day with ... the lobbyist claimed in one sentence that "Tesla has a monopoly!" Then in another sentence boasted how Tesla only has 0.1% of NJ marketshare. The professor quickly stated that one can not have a "monopoly on a single brand" and that it was ridiculous for a group that has 99.9% market share to claim that a company with 0.1% market share has a monopoly.
The lobbyist also tried to tie the current GM non-recall fiasco to "Tesla might do the same someday." Meanwhile, back in reality the GM fiasco occurred under the very system the lobbyist was defending.
It was comedy, and any inventor with half a brain can see the ridiculousness of the lobbyists arguments.
Still waiting for the link on bloomberg ... it might be a little bit ...
The simpleton says that "Tesla has a monopoly on Tesla cars"
Well damn, I had a strong feeling last night when going to sleep that we were going to have a good day today as people realized NJ didn't mean anything, and I didn't act on it. Oh well.
Actually, this is quite interesting. This statement really provides a window into the minds of the dealers, I think.
First, it reeks of jealousy - "it's no fair, why can't WE sell the best car from the hottest brand!"
But second, and perhaps more importantly - it speaks to the moat which Tesla has. Now, I don't actually believe that Tesla has a significant technological advantage. At the end of the day an EV is a very simple thing to make, much much simpler than a gas car, and I guarantee that the auto companies, if they actually bothered to put effort into it, could make a competitive EV to Tesla. It's not like nobody else can use 18650s, and everyone uses the same type of motor anyway, and they could write an internet-updating car, and they can make good interiors, etc. However, the problem is that their minds are in the wrong place, and most of them don't actually want to put effort into making an attractive EV - but this is not insurmountable. So where is Tesla's moat, if not in technology?
I think the moat evidenced by this guy's comment is in the minds of the consumer. He speaks of "Tesla cars" as if they're an actual thing, a different thing which only Tesla can make...and he's right. Tesla is the only company capable of making Tesla cars. Why does this matter though? Because Tesla is the de facto brand of the future. Tesla is *the* EV maker. Tesla is cool, they have first mover advantage, and people who know they exist identify them inextricably with EVs. Everyone who wants an electric car wants a Tesla. Tesla is the iPod, anything else which comes out from a bigger, established company is the Zune. Tesla won this brand battle, they did so in plain view of everyone, they did so while being written off, after announcing their intentions publicly many times, and now the traditional portion of the industry doesn't know what to do about it.
Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if in 10 years we see Tesla's name turn into a genericized trademark for electric cars, a la "kleenex" and "rollerblades."
17:08 | $ 247.50 High | 76,500 |
The auto dealers' lobbyists remind me of the black comedy movie "Thank You For Smoking", with Aaron Eckhart doing a fabulous job as a lobbyist. If you haven't seen it, it will give you a(nother) laugh. While I'm laughing at the real life parody, I'm also angry on the inside because this dealer association crap is so frustrating.
Now, I don't actually believe that Tesla has a significant technological advantage. At the end of the day an EV is a very simple thing to make, much much simpler than a gas car, and I guarantee that the auto companies, if they actually bothered to put effort into it, could make a competitive EV to Tesla. It's not like nobody else can use 18650s, and everyone uses the same type of motor anyway, and they could write an internet-updating car OS, and they can make good interiors, etc. However, the problem is that their minds are in the wrong place, and most of them don't actually want to put effort into making an attractive EV - but this is not insurmountable. So where is Tesla's moat, if not in technology?
Short Interest Update
TESLA MOTORS
Feb 14: 31,295,800
Feb 28: 28,923,212
Avg Daily Volume
16,678,472
FYI, this is the reason for the spike up about 2 hours before the close, and in AH:
Musk’s Tesla Hires Chief Spokesman From Renault-Nissan - Bloomberg
I'm very pleased by this talent acquisition, looks to be another ace Elon Musk hire.