Norbert
TSLA will win
Doe anyone know whether the Leaf's 73 EPA mile range is achieved with putting some battery capacity aside, as reserve, and only using perhaps 21 kWh or so, or if it is achieved with the full 24 kWh, also using the reserve ?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Typically the manufacturer runs the numbers them selves and submits them to the EPA. The EPA lab only verifies a small fraction of the vehicles on the market each year. Not sure if the Model S was actually tested by the EPA or not. But given the scenario you can pretty much guarantee that Tesla will have chosen the most efficient charging rate to present the Model S in the best possible light.
The usable capacity of the Nissan LEAF is around 21 kWh. The EPA test procedures dictate that the car be charged to 100% and run through the test until the car is unable to go fast enough to run through the load profile. It takes around 24-25 kWh from the wall on L2 240V/16A to charge the LEAF from turtle mode to 100%.Doe anyone know whether the Leaf's 73 EPA mile range is achieved with putting some battery capacity aside, as reserve, and only using perhaps 21 kWh or so, or if it is achieved with the full 24 kWh, also using the reserve ?
I don't think that's correct - it should be apples to apples on the basis of the equivalent math above. The Fisker numbers are very close (3-5%), and the delta is within rounding errors. The Model S nums seem off by20% .
The base car will start at $64,900 – $57,400 after deducting the federal $7,500 tax credit. A top-line Performance Model, with the big battery, goes for $87,400 after the tax credit.
....
I don't understand how this is allowed to occur. It takes two seconds to look at Tesla's website and see that the base car price this writer is quoting is wrong. It seems more blatant lie than casual oversight and it really annoys me that this guy isn't checking his facts.
Interested to see if Tesla can make the charging scheme more efficient. My money says yes.
Wall Socket Recharging Power kW | City MPGe | Highway MPGe | Combined MPGe | Cost Saving $ |
2 | ||||
10 |
The 2012 Leaf gets 34kWh/100miles. AER is 73 miles. Works out to 24.82kWh to charge. 21kWh usable. 84.6% charging efficiency.
http://www.hypermiler.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/nissan-leaf-epa-sticker-photo.jpg
The numbers will vary based on how much actual usable capacity the car has and also the charging efficiency. The established EPA procedure is to measure electricity used at the socket. If the usable capacity percentage is the same as the charging efficiency percentage, the result will be like the Fisker's numbers.
http://www.smidgeindustriesltd.com/leaf/EPA/EPA_test_procedure_for_EVs-PHEVs-1-13-2011.pdf
The 2013 Volt gets 35kWh/100miles. AER is 38 miles. Works out to 13.3kWh to fully charge. 10.8kWh usable. 81.2% charging efficiency.
http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/2013-Chevrolet-Volt-window-sticker.jpg
The 2012 Leaf gets 34kWh/100miles. AER is 73 miles. Works out to 24.82kWh to charge. 21kWh usable. 84.6% charging efficiency.
http://www.hypermiler.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/nissan-leaf-epa-sticker-photo.jpg
The Fisker gets 65kWh/100miles. AER is 32 miles. Works out to 20.8kWh to charge. 18kWh usable (found the link below). 86.5% charging efficiency. As I said, the actual capacity is 20.1, so 89.6% usage (similar to the charging efficiency) which makes the math seem to work out (but not quite).
http://www.thecarconnection.com/review/1073134_2012-fisker-karma_green_7
That said, I would still presume that only the usable amount matters in the MPGe calc since its not like at every 'fill up' you need to replenish this reserve (since its not depleted by the vehicle).
Got the number from the Leaf forum (it was measured by one of the members):So before using the reserve, the Leaf uses even less than 21 kWh, but the 73 miles range includes the reserve? Do you have a link for this number?
You are correct that the energy is lost as heat in the cable/plug/onboard charger. There's minimal loss from the cable and plug; most of it is from the onboard charger converting 120V or 240V AC electricity from the socket to ~400V DC electricity to charge the battery. The battery also heats up during charging and energy is lost there too. That's why proper ventilation while charging may be necessary if your garage temperatures are high. There's also some loss when drawing electricity from the battery, but that's minimal also.Thanks - helpful. When you talk about 'charging efficiency' are you suggesting that there's energy loss between the wall socket and the car's battery i.e. as heat in the cable/plug/onboard charger? I know that each of these cars has a electric unusable reserve amount in the battery to preserve battery life/longevity and prevent bricking (Fisker's is 15%, so the actual A123 battery is 23 kwh but only 20kwh or so is usuable). That said, I would still presume that only the usable amount matters in the MPGe calc since its not like at every 'fill up' you need to replenish this reserve (since its not depleted by the vehicle).
http://www.thecarconnection.com/review/1073134_2012-fisker-karma_green_7Fisker says the Karma uses 18 of the 20.1 kWh in its lithium-ion battery pack
You are correct that the energy is lost as heat in the cable/plug/onboard charger. There's minimal loss from the cable and plug; most of it is from the onboard charger converting 120V or 240V AC electricity from the socket to ~400V DC electricity to charge the battery. That's why proper ventilation while charging may be necessary if your garage temperatures are high. There's also some loss when drawing electricity from the battery, but that's minimal also.
AFAIK, the Model S and Roadster additionally use battery cooling during charging, which also requires energy.
For liquid cooled batteries (doesn't apply to Leaf), yes battery cooling also requires additional energy.
Yep - at a minimum it would be nice if the EPA tests at least reported what charge rate was used to get the economy numbers. Ideally, we'd get numbers for a few different common charge rates.Ultimately the EPA 5 step test needs to include a standard for recharging (e.g all electric vehicles which can be recharged from a wall socket are recharged at "X" kW)