zmarvin
Member
That’s wild considering people on this thread are saying it’s louder than their f350The model s is significantly quieter than the 3.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s wild considering people on this thread are saying it’s louder than their f350The model s is significantly quieter than the 3.
Yep many of the Ford and other OEM execs are not exactly fans of the Tesla product. Uncertain why?That’s wild considering people on this thread are saying it’s louder than their f350
good pointYep many of the Ford and other OEM execs are not exactly fans of the Tesla product. Uncertain why?
The S isn’t quiet, it’s just more quiet than the 3. And yes, a ford F series is much quieter than the S.That’s wild considering people on this thread are saying it’s louder than their f350
I’d be curious to see db readings at highway speeds for each oneThe S isn’t quiet, it’s just more quiet than the 3. And yes, a ford F series is much quieter than the S.
The new Model S is loads quieter than a first gen. I have 2015 P90DL and test drove a 2023 Plaid late November. One of the first things we noticed while on the rd was how much quiter the new gen was vs our 2015. The differences are leaps and bounds better. The double plane glass, active noise cancelling, way better of an overall build, are all factors in makin this car quieter than a Gen 1. Once again, you're seeing personal preferences concentrated on the forums. Stating "able to listen to the radio on the hwy" sounds like a bit of an exaggeration, but I do not know YOUR car, and can only base it off the ones I have owned and driven.I have a December 2014 P85D and it has always been noisy inside the cab and that is from the tires. The Michelin Pilot Sports were the worst. The Continentals are much quieter, but overall the car is much, much noisier than my 3-series BMW. I want a new Model S, but I'm thinking that after 8 years of an EV I might have to go back to a gas car and that is extremely disappointing. I like the EV ride and torque and all that, but I want a ride where I can listen to the radio when I'm driving on the highway. The car is just too noisy. I had heard the new Model S was quiet, but after reading the forums, I don't know.
Oh my, THANK YOU for setting me straight!Thanks for your confirmation biased research. So helpful.
I'll wade into this swamp once. If we want to be charitable I think we can postulate that current "climate emergency" is driven by genuine concern because alternative is profit and when did humans do anything for profit? Anyway, the "climate emergency" is based on the models and so it happens we had really good front seat to how good these models are during pandemic.Oh my, THANK YOU for setting me straight!
All those pesky scientists making all that climate science up--I was so easily fooled . . . .
Could you please provide your links to legitimate, NON-kook, websites advising the truth? That we CAN dump unlimited amounts of GHG's because chemistry and physics aren't really "science" and the so-called "scientists" are just shills for George Soros, Al Gore, and Hillary Clinton.
We'll all be waiting so please provide your sources ASAP!
Thank you so much for setting us straight--this forum is so informative with erudite posters such as yourself!
Could you please provide your links to legitimate, NON-kook, websites advising the truth? That we CAN dump unlimited amounts of GHG's because chemistry and physics aren't really "science" and the so-called "scientists" are just shills for George Soros, Al Gore, and Hillary Clinton.
It was a leading hypothesis and probably did set back years of alternate research avenues, but it was never taken as fact except perhaps in the laymen community. I am not aware of anyone who was canceled over exploring alternative hypotheses for Alzheimer’s.Do a search on "Alzheimer Fraud." Short story version: 2 dudes were under a lot of career pressure to put out their research paper on the root cause of Alzheimer. In 2006, they published their scientific results with proof in the form of brain scans that they photoshopped. Since 2006, over 2,000 research teams used their results as the starting point for their research to find a cure. It was all a lie. Anyone in the scientific community that tried to expose the lie was cancelled, but the truth finally came out. Much of the research on this condition that affects so many was stunted by these 2 bozos just trying to protect their careers. Imagine the money on the line with climate change.
Everything you believe is based on lies.
Wow, to think someone posting here, with the financial acumen to purchase a Tesla (in the past), could have such a warped view of climate science because of . . . this.Do a search on "Alzheimer Fraud." Short story version: 2 dudes were under a lot of career pressure to put out their research paper on the root cause of Alzheimer. In 2006, they published their scientific results with proof in the form of brain scans that they photoshopped. Since 2006, over 2,000 research teams used their results as the starting point for their research to find a cure. It was all a lie. Anyone in the scientific community that tried to expose the lie was cancelled, but the truth finally came out. Much of the research on this condition that affects so many was stunted by these 2 bozos just trying to protect their careers. Imagine the money on the line with climate change.
Everything you believe is based on lies.
It was a leading hypothesis and probably did set back years of alternate research avenues, but it was never taken as fact except perhaps in the laymen community. I am not aware of anyone who was canceled over exploring alternative hypotheses for Alzheimer’s.
Wow, to think someone posting here, with the financial acumen to purchase a Tesla (in the past), could have such a warped view of climate science because of . . . this.
Scary, just plain scary, how so many have been so easily fooled, by so few, with so very, very little.
Our species may not deserve this beautiful planet after all given the level of intelligence, or lack thereof, prevenient among so many in our species.
So I AGAIN make the request:
PLEASE POST YOUR LINKS TO LEGITIMATE, non-kook, WEBSITES ADVISING THAT WE CAN DUMP UNLIMITED AMOUNTS OF GHG's WITH NO WORRY WHATSOEVER.
(Or are physics and chemistry all a plot/scam too?)
The irony of thinking Elon is the sane one lol.
Have fun with your jag
Have fun with your piece of crap.
It was a leading hypothesis and probably did set back years of alternate research avenues, but it was never taken as fact except perhaps in the laymen community. I am not aware of anyone who was canceled over exploring alternative hypotheses for Alzheimer’s.
With a Houston location, perhaps you're just blind to the planetary-scale risks because that's where your pay check comes from? Pulling fossil fuels out of the ground is mind-blowingly lucrative. Are you part of, or tangential to, the $11,000,000,000 (that's ELEVEN BILLION DOLLARS in DAILY PROFITS for the global fossil fuel industry folks--see link below), by having some small part of that washing into your bank account once or twice a month?Where do you get your misinformation? Everything I said was correct. Researches that didn't go along with the lie (aka party line, just like there's a climate change party line/lie) had their funding pulled, which exactly amounts to cancelling in the research community. Think about it. What happens to your career as a researcher when your funding is taken away so you can't do any research?? Duh. Here, this video will help educate you.
Yes, of course.Take the climate talk somewhere else. Filling the thread with unrelated bullshit