Question:
Answer:
As P85DEE said, they are on a mission and they will be ready for anybody how wants to come back for more. There is no point discussing when that is their position, because they are not engaging to understand, but to take the opposite argument. Sad but true
@P85DEE why do you continue to ignore the mountain of evidence
Answer:
I thought informing others as to the error in the reasoning and position that the car's horsepower was "overstated" by Tesla was part of the mission.
I figure if anyone else wants to come back for more, well then I'll do my part to give them another side of the matter.
Funny how we can interpret this differently. To me this shows that Tesla showed references to ECE R85 when the numbers had no missing info and no negative effect for them marketing-wise.
BUT as soon as the D-event was over they _removed_ these references from website and manuals.... Also removing battery limited horsepower-numbers.
I see that as the perfect evidence they knew exactly what they where doing here and chose to only list motor power as opposed to what they used to do.
- - - Updated - - -
Exactly.. Most of the people nagging on about this here conveniantly ignore those aspects or simply write them off as irellevant...
As P85DEE said, they are on a mission and they will be ready for anybody how wants to come back for more. There is no point discussing when that is their position, because they are not engaging to understand, but to take the opposite argument. Sad but true