Rodolfo Paiz
Fidelius Family Office
Given that our 30 mile-average projected range is apt to be the most useful/most accurate estimate, I agree that it should be displayed on he speedometer. Having the rated or ideal ranges displayed has the potential for disaster if they are relied upon - it would be like driving an ICE with a broken gas gauge!
I wouldn't go that far. Any range estimate will have weaknesses, which is why some people want to have their battery capacity reported to them simply as a percentage. For example, the 30-mile projected range is great, so long as the next 30 or N miles we care about forecasting have a topography and driving style similar to the last 30 miles. But if I'm going from flat Florida into the mountains, or going from a long highway trip to running errands in the city, the projected range is going to be wildly inaccurate. Same goes for rated/ideal range, of course.
However, driving around with rated range displayed on the speedo is not at all like a broken gas gauge in an ICE. Quite the opposite, it's almost exactly the equivalent of the gas gauge: a simple measurement of the energy in the battery, multiplied by a fixed number to arrive at the EPA rated range for a full battery. 85 KWh x 3.12 = 265 miles, or something like that.
And of course, all of this applies just as well to "projected range" calculations in an ICE. The gas gauge is an incredibly rough and primitive indication of remaining range, and the cars that do project range do so based on some fixed algorithm based on the previous X miles... and they can be just as wrong.
I still want to be able to show my projected range in the speedo. For me (Florida being flat as a pancake), that's the best indication of real-world range. And since it's so easy to add as an option, why not give me the choice?