Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

I've enagaged lawyers in an attempt to recover FSD cost (Australian owner)

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Update on Dispute with Tesla Regarding Full Self-Driving (FSD) Charges

Attached is the complete exchange between my lawyers and Tesla.

Summary:
  1. Tesla has declined responsibility for not delivering the FSD feature, resulting in no refund being offered (see attached).
  2. Consequently, I have directed my legal team to file a complaint with the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) on my behalf (see attached).
  3. It appears that further discussions with Tesla will not yield any progress. Although escalating this to the ACCC aligns with my ethical standards, it doesn't give me an immediate refund.
  4. I've prepared a draft for my lawyers to initiate a Statement of Claim to be filed in the Local Court, though I haven't sent it to them yet.

I'm a long-time supporter of Tesla and Elon Musk, beginning for me in 2011 with my fascination with SpaceX's grasshopper launches. That's how I discovered Telsa. Years later I was one of the early-adopters of the Model 3. Since then I've owned 1 other Tesla and have put down a deposit last week for another.
Unfortunately, my enthusiasm has been significantly dampened by all this. The lack of accountability is disheartening and goes against the principles of fairness and integrity I thought Elon valued.

Given the circumstances has anyone here pursued a similar case? What was your experience, and do you think it could be successful?
wow. I have never bought or refused to buy something because of a CEO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OzVic and Jules22
wow. I have never bought or refused to buy something because of a CEO.
Public statements buy the CEO about the products would never have any bearing in your decision? I appreciate that few CEOs directly talk about their product features, but Elon Musk certainly has in the past, and clearly in a way that is intended as information for potential customers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaykaye
I don't think anyone has seen a CEO like Musk.
people said same for Steve Jobs... minus the social media, as he was before social media time...
Just because someone talks to wider audience via social media round the clock doesn't make them better CEO... CEO who promises random stuff all the time and never accomplishing it (Summon, parking, wipers, FSD...) but charges for it, misrepresents the product selling (FSD) and sells cars on self-driving future and promise aspects (how long we heard promises) but forever fails to accomplish it - what you would call in different circumstances? Elizabeth Anne Holmes? Elon Musk?

Either definition for good, bad, fraud, scamster, visionary, innovator, Rockstar CEO is changed now... or we are living in era of ignorance.

Disclaimer for cult fans, before they lynch me: I don't hate any of them, I don't associate with any of them... just sharing the observation and raising question on why one company/person's failed promise is OK but all other's isn't?
 
Throwing accusations of fraud around because someone made a guestimate of when something that has never been done before will be done, or because auto wipers don't work perfectly for everyone yet, is just stupid.

Is he over-optimistic, sure, has that been obvious for years, yes, he always ends up delivering even when all the 'experts' tell us it's impossible. Guestimates are not promises, taking longer to deliver on something than estimated, is not fraud or scam, etc, making those sweeping accusations just makes a person look very silly.

I support the OP and have done so publicly, but these last few posts are really going off the rails.
 
Last edited:
I am surprised that the ACCC has not cracked down on this. FSD is coming, evidently, judging by what is currently available in the USA - however depending on our regulators this could be years further down the track. Furthermore, it will likely be a subscription model when it is released.

I don't see why you can't simply purchase FSD once and transfer it to your next Tesla in perpetuity. Is there a problem with that?
 
For me, the "coming soon" does not imply a set delivery time
Yes, this is true, as far as I am aware no "promises" have ever been made HOWEVER I think it's a reasonable expectation of SOME benefit in the lifetime of the vehicle, which is why I support the OP.

I belive Tesla is of no legal obligation to do anything as they have delivered what was "promised", however I do think (and it seems they have in previous examples) that they should offer something for those who purchased early and still haven't received a tangible benefit.
 
Last edited:
  • Funny
Reactions: Audietron
I am surprised that the ACCC has not cracked down on this. FSD is coming, evidently, judging by what is currently available in the USA - however depending on our regulators this could be years further down the track. Furthermore, it will likely be a subscription model when it is released.

I don't see why you can't simply purchase FSD once and transfer it to your next Tesla in perpetuity. Is there a problem with that?
Crack down on what? They are clear what is offered and people are welcome to purchase it or not.

I do agree with transfer being available for those who purchase, but they are under no obligation to do so.
 
I belive Tesla is of no legal obligation to do anything as they have delivered what was promised,
This post and discussion is about Tesla misrepresenting the FSD and not delivering what was promised when purchased.
it's car manufacturer's legal obligation to deliver what they sell and promise to customer in exchange for money customer paid. also, deliver that without known risks (phantom breaking) which could risk 'vehicle or life.
Throwing accusations of fraud around because someone made a guestimate of when something that has never been done before will be done, or because auto wipers don't work perfectly for everyone yet, is just stupid.
definition of Fraud is "a person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities."

Doesn't that sound familiar to what's happening here? by the way, every car company on planet got wipers working perfectly, except Tesla. beta testing on production vehicle is not safe practice and similar to criminal offence if it could impair driver's visibility...

Elon Musk is visionary, but being visionary and being someone making claims without factual backing or clear pathway is very irresponsible...
 

Tesla faked an FSD demo drive in 2016

Tesla's CEO said it was coming 'this year' pretty much every year

He used strong arm price tactics to sell it

The website until at least April 2020 said it was coming 'later this year'

Narrator - it did not