You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If this is because they are dangerous, then this is not enough. If they are so bad you can't drive one even with the driver assist turned off, then it should be illegal to own one? Or sell one?? But these have proven to be safer than cars without driver assist, therefore all motor vehicles must be banned in BC. Anyone owning, selling or buying a motor vehicle should be jailed immediately! This approach could set British Columbia back a little - like to the stone age.
If this is because they are dangerous, then this is not enough. If they are so bad you can't drive one even with the driver assist turned off, then it should be illegal to own one? Or sell one?? But these have proven to be safer than cars without driver assist, therefore all motor vehicles must be banned in BC. Anyone owning, selling or buying a motor vehicle should be jailed immediately! This approach could set British Columbia back a little - like to the stone age.
This is great. I was feeling a bit bad about the corruption and stupidity of our bureaucrats, but perhaps our's aren't so bad after all? At least relatively.
If you read it it says it would be illegal to drive a Mercedes EQS manually in BC because it has L3 capabilities.It helps to read the actual government information. In full.
If they were just trying to ban the use of such features then why do they distinguish between driving a vehicle with an L3 feature and use of the L3 feature?This means that highly automated self-driving vehicles cannot yet be driven on public roads in B.C., nor can highly automated self-driving features be used
If you read the link, it says that they are open to pilot programs. They are stopping companies from putting L3 cars on the road without any regulation at all.If you read it it says it would be illegal to drive a Mercedes EQS manually in BC because it has L3 capabilities.
If they were just trying to ban the use of such features then why do they distinguish between driving a vehicle with an L3 feature and use of the L3 feature?