Joe F
Disruption is hard.
Thank you. You all were on a roll today.Cease!
Says who?
Sesame.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you. You all were on a roll today.Cease!
Says who?
Sesame.
I wonder whether whatever new tech. is introduced for Y will be introduced at the same time for the 3.Looking forward to the first tear down analysis of the Model Y. I’m especially curious about the new wiring architecture and to what extent that simplifies construction and reduces cost of construction.
Just before reading the above I picked up a handful of 320$ Jan. 17 calls, which I now feel pretty good about.
My worry for downward stock pressure would be if they warn about a weak Q1 in the delivery report, or Q4 results.
Leaks from China suggest that they have orders for all of GF3 production until end of Q1 already.
Assuming they make about 3k GF3 units in Q4 but don't deliver them, enter January with a 1k/week rate and exit Q1 with a 2.5k/week rate (80% of nominal capacity), then that's a GF3 production of about 29k units, and similar deliveries.
That's a lot of Q1 cushion.
WusterHe’ll boot you all the way back to Worcestershire!
Indestrucktable!
First they have to find a way to actually make a profit, which is hard to do when you are only relying on people traveling plus apartment and condo dwellers. In the future almost all apartments and condos will be charge capable, which limits the long term profits to travel only. Destination chargers eat into the travel only profit.
Thank you. You all were on a roll today.
Taycan doesn't use regen breaking right? If that's correct it's a baffling decision to make driving seem more like an ICE at the cost of range.Wow. The Model X Performance beats this. Would probably beat it while towing a Taycan, in fact.
When Taycan celebrates they sold 20k for the year, GF4 targets 500k/year.
This pretty much sums up all competitions to come.
When they think they can make a car that’s remotely comparable to Model S, Tesla is cranking out Model 3 like crazy, Model S doesn’t have any meaningful impact to financials anymore. And there is just no way they can make anything to compete with Model 3.
When they somehow catch up on Model 3, Tesla is cranking Model Y instead.
When they catch up on Model Y, CyberTruck becomes the real game.
Speed solves everything. Everyone else is playing catch-up and they are not running nearly as fast.
Note: when I say catchup, I mean offering a alternative that’s inferior in every way, and have to be priced at loss to get enough buyers just want to be different.
There is a Supercharger in Moscow.
No. The Taycan has upgraded friction brakes that can handle the load 100% and might do that on the track to keep the battery temps under control. That is not default behavior.Taycan doesn't use regen breaking right? If that's correct it's a baffling decision to make driving seem more like an ICE at the cost of range.
Thanks - 201 miles on 93.5 kWh is unbelievably bad. Worse than even pre-update i-Pace despite much less frontal area. How did Porsche screw this up so badly? BTW, they got "independent" AMCI to certify it at 275 "real world" miles. Hmmm.As we’ve learned, the WLTP ratings are insanely gameable and all of the Europeans have designed their cars to excel on WLTP, but not in real life or EPA. The Koreans and Tesla have far less variation between the ratings.
The 4S with the optional battery pack, Turbo and Turbo S Models all have the 93.5 kWh pack
The 4S and even lesser models to be introduced will have a 79.2 kWh pack.
Maybe they’re more efficient so they won’t lose the full 15% (30 miles) of range the smaller pack would indicate.
Yikes.EVBite - Yesterday:
With the Ford Mustang Mach E around the corner and praise being sent towards Ford for their "commitment" to electric vehicles, we thought it would be best to get some first hand experience with their front line.
I don't think they screwed up, it's just that Tesla really has a major lead. They also clearly prioritized speed.Thanks - 201 miles on 93.5 kWh is unbelievably bad. Worse than even pre-update i-Pace despite much less frontal area. How did Porsche screw this up so badly? BTW, they got "independent" AMCI to certify it at 275 "real world" miles. Hmmm.
Taycan doesn't use regen breaking right? If that's correct it's a baffling decision to make driving seem more like an ICE at the cost of range.
True, but that still doesn't leave all that much. 1/100?, 1/1000? compared to ICE vehicles.In the future all vehicles will be BEV, expanding the market.
Large condos/apartment complexes have network chargers and that may expand in the future.
There will be those that need to charge that are out and about not necessarily traveling. Not everyone will have 500 plus mile range that they remember to top off every night.