Crowded Mind
Member
Sorry to be that guy, but in meetings all day. Would anyone kindly summarize (without being tempted by sarcasm) what's dropping us today?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry to be that guy, but in meetings all day. Would anyone kindly summarize (without being tempted by sarcasm) what's dropping us today?
I'm willing to bet that the Pacific Crest piece only came out today after they realized yesterday's Mortan Stanley piece didn't work to push the stock down (instead it went up towards the $200 mark with intra-day high of 199.52) and wanted to suppress the stock from breaking $200 with a piece this morning. Pacific Crest likely had wrote the report a while ago in the back burner just waiting for the right timing to be used (today). Just like Morgan Stanley, why they cannot wait until after ER to publish a report is quite suspect.
Today's Tesla feels a lot like yesterday's Commodore.
The perception is out there that Tesla screwed the pooch with regards to Model X and the supplier lawsuit just reinforces that feeling. Just look at what the respectable analysts are doing - cutting their stock price, telling investors to stay away from the stock, etc. Tesla BARELY hit their own downwardly revised numbers, but only by rushing end-of-quarter deliveries. Judging by the number of QC issues from December deliveries discussed at TMC, it seems like Tesla was making a desperate attempt to push cars out of the factory that did not live up to even the most basic QC. And they came in just a few hundred above the low end of their downwardly revised guidance.
We can make whatever excuses we want for Tesla because we love Tesla. However, the bottom line is that Tesla has not been moving in a positive direction for some time as witnessed by the opinions and outcries of the owners in this forum. The negative opinions are coming from the longtime faithful who are seeing Tesla change for the worse, not better. I want Tesla to get back to being that upstart car company that constantly amazed, rarely disappointed, and where there was good news around every corner. Unfortunately, I haven't felt that way since late 2014.
Do you mean the respected analysts Adam Jonas and Brad Ericksson?
https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/brad-erickson
I will tell you the secret to getting rich on Wall Street. You try to be greedy when others are fearful. And you try to be fearful when others are greedy
We need a real leader to take over the day-to-day management duties from the engineer who has an obvious problem managing both priorities and expectations. Tesla lost George Blankenship, Jerome Guillen, and Deepak Ahuja. Judging by the state of Tesla's executive management page, it doesn't appear there is anyone left. Tesla is pissing off too many people, most of them owners, and I believe Tesla's downward spiral may have begun.
Honestly, Elon already raised the cash they need to get through a slow Model X ramp at $242. Now the only thing he needs to do is get Model X production ramped. I wouldn't discount the possibility he buys more stock but that would be it. Especially since there is no evidence Model X production is at 400/week.we need a positive comment from elon, something like model x production rate is 400/week now or anything that will stop the panic selling.
Otherwise im afraid we might tank under $177 b4 the ER.
If you are convincing yourself or being convinced by others that this is all part of the plan to "trap the shorts", you are delusional.
Major short squeezes do not occur at the bottom of a 52 week range. They occur when there is high short interest at the top of a 52 week range and unexpected good news arrives. This is what happened in 2013, when TSLA was already trading at 38 (all time high) before the squeeze even started.
This is because at the top of a 52 week range, by definition almost all shorts are holding losses, so when unexpected good news propels the stock even higher, some finally capitulate and cover, while others who have deeper losses may face margin calls. This becomes a feedback loop that drives the stock ever higher (more people covering leading to more margin calls) - a short squeeze.
That isn't remotely close to the situation now. Yes short interest has ticked up to 29 million, but it was already at 27 million when TSLA was trading at 250. At 52 week lows, shorts are either making money, or losing less than before. Even if there is unexpected good news and the stock goes up, we are simply going back to where we were trading a few weeks ago. So if a short was up money, they lose some of their profits. If a short was down less, they go back to being down the same amount they were down a few weeks ago. No one is being squeezed, no forced margin calls.
If anything, the people being squeezed right now are the longs. There are plenty who are either down money, or as early investors wondering if they should take their profits. There is also stops losses that will get triggered below 180 which would create a negative feedback loop, an air pocket all the way down to 150 minimum and possibly 120. To avoid something like that we need ER to deliver just to keep the boat afloat. Because there is no way around it, price action is terrible.
I'm willing to bet that the Pacific Crest piece only came out today after they realized yesterday's Mortan Stanley piece didn't work to push the stock down (instead it went up towards the $200 mark with intra-day high of 199.52) and wanted to suppress the stock from breaking $200 with a piece this morning. Pacific Crest likely had wrote the report a while ago in the back burner just waiting for the right timing to be used (today). Just like Morgan Stanley, why they cannot wait until after ER to publish a report is quite suspect.
we need a positive comment from elon, something like model x production rate is 400/week now or anything that will stop the panic selling.
Otherwise im afraid we might tank under $177 b4 the ER.
If you are convincing yourself or being convinced by others that this is all part of the plan to "trap the shorts", you are delusional.
Major short squeezes do not occur at the bottom of a 52 week range. They occur when there is high short interest at the top of a 52 week range and unexpected good news arrives. This is what happened in 2013, when TSLA was already trading at 38 (all time high) before the squeeze even started.
This is because at the top of a 52 week range, by definition almost all shorts are holding losses, so when unexpected good news propels the stock even higher, some finally capitulate and cover, while others who have deeper losses may face margin calls. This becomes a feedback loop that drives the stock ever higher (more people covering leading to more margin calls) - a short squeeze.
That isn't remotely close to the situation now. Yes short interest has ticked up to 29 million, but it was already at 27 million when TSLA was trading at 250. At 52 week lows, shorts are either making money, or losing less than before. Even if there is unexpected good news and the stock goes up, we are simply going back to where we were trading a few weeks ago. So if a short was up money, they lose some of their profits. If a short was down less, they go back to being down the same amount they were down a few weeks ago. No one is being squeezed, no forced margin calls.
If anything, the people being squeezed right now are the longs. There are plenty who are either down money, or as early investors wondering if they should take their profits. There is also stops losses that will get triggered below 180 which would create a negative feedback loop, an air pocket all the way down to 150 minimum and possibly 120. To avoid something like that we need ER to deliver just to keep the boat afloat. Because there is no way around it, price action is terrible.
Do you mean the respected analysts Adam Jonas and Brad Ericksson?
https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/brad-erickson
If you are convincing yourself or being convinced by others that this is all part of the plan to "trap the shorts", you are delusional.
Major short squeezes do not occur at the bottom of a 52 week range. They occur when there is high short interest at the top of a 52 week range and unexpected good news arrives. This is what happened in 2013, when TSLA was already trading at 38 (all time high) before the squeeze even started.
This is because at the top of a 52 week range, by definition almost all shorts are holding losses, so when unexpected good news propels the stock even higher, some finally capitulate and cover, while others who have deeper losses may face margin calls. This becomes a feedback loop that drives the stock ever higher (more people covering leading to more margin calls) - a short squeeze.
That isn't remotely close to the situation now. Yes short interest has ticked up to 29 million, but it was already at 27 million when TSLA was trading at 250. At 52 week lows, shorts are either making money, or losing less than before. Even if there is unexpected good news and the stock goes up, we are simply going back to where we were trading a few weeks ago. So if a short was up money, they lose some of their profits. If a short was down less, they go back to being down the same amount they were down a few weeks ago. No one is being squeezed, no forced margin calls.
If anything, the people being squeezed right now are the longs. There are plenty who are either down money, or as early investors wondering if they should take their profits. There is also stops losses that will get triggered below 180 which would create a negative feedback loop, an air pocket all the way down to 150 minimum and possibly 120. To avoid something like that we need ER to deliver just to keep the boat afloat. Because there is no way around it, price action is terrible.