Shipbldr200
Member
Elon! I want a Tesla branded toaster oven!
I do too, but only if it is fully unlocked on day one.
Don't make me pay extra for the -L version of the toaster...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Elon! I want a Tesla branded toaster oven!
That's true. I think the same applies to Toyota too, or any new car. The less someone spends on a reasonably fuel efficient hybrid or EV, or even an electric bicycle, and the more they spend on PV, the more CO2 they'll offset assuming they're replacing nothing but coal. Whether they'll replace mostly coal is regional though, so YMMV as usual.I share your sentiments and outlook, but I have been waiting a long time for a Tesla and I'm going to spend the money.
The simple truth though is that in terms of green-ness per dollar there are much better choices than a Tesla.
WHaaaat ?! say my fellow Model 3 wannabees. How is that even possible ?
The short answer is that the money saved on the difference in car prices spent on PV makes the comparison lopsided.
$15k dollars can generate around 15 MWh for 30 years, so 450 MWh
450 MWh can displace about 450,000 Kg of CO2 from coal combustion
At 10 Kg CO2 per gallon, that is 45,000 gallons of petrol. Say 2.5M gas miles ?
That is the closest a Tesla vs a Prime+PV gets. If criteria pollutants are considered the comparison is embarrassing.
Our fleet average for our Volts hovers around 380 miles per gallon of gasoline for 3 Volts. Including all sales taxes, incentives, and rebates, they were between $25.5, and $28k new.
The Volt was on the road with lithium batteries batteries and a 149 hp electric motor back when the Prius was still using NiMH and had no PHEV variant, and I believe a new, larger 80hp electric motor. When the PHEV variant was released, it was a joke to appease CARB. 6 miles electric range if you crept along at bicycle speeds. Still NiMH. Toyota originally lied about the Prius power output and had to change it. Not sure if they are still lying. They also mislead folk by gaming the EPA system with their PHEVs. By completing only the loops they can complete under pure EV power and listing that as their MPGe EV mode, they can inflate their economy.
To put the power issue in perspective, running both the gasoline and electric motors, the Prime hits 60mph in 10 seconds. Without gasoline, the Prime takes over 12 seconds. The Volt hits 60 in 7.5 seconds. Without the gasoline engine running.
All numbers are from the same testers at C&D. Somebody is fibbing. And this is after Toyota reduced their advertised HP. Before, it had the Toyota with a better PW ratio yet slower than the Volt by a sizable amount.
- Toyota claims 121 HP of electric power, and weighs 3378, for 27.9 lb/hp to yield 12.2 seconds to 60mph in EV mode.
- Chevy claims 149 HP of electric power, and weighs 3523, for 23.6 lb/hp to yield 7.5 seconds to 60mph in EV mode.
But still, when the majority of Americans are asked to name an electric car, they name the Prius, and this dates back before the PiP existed. Toyota certainly won in the marketing department. They have a marginal compliance car, and an H2 car that doesn't sell, but are known as the greenest car company on earth, even though they sell some of the most gas guzzling vehicles on the market:
Compare Side-by-Side
Note that I selected the 420HP versions of the Escalade SUV, and GMC Denali pickup. Far more powerful and larger engines than the Toyotas.
This is the only reason Toyota sells the Prime. Their CEO acknowledges that EVs make no sense, so they make a car just similar enough to a EV to be able to sell the thirstiest trucks on the market. They are exactly as green as the government forces them to be. Even when the Prius was released so that Toyota could become The Electric Hybrid Car and the Greenest Car Company, the Honda Insight was actually greener, but lost the Green Marketing contest to the dirtier car.
But if I were dead set again all things GM, and would accept a conventional hybrid design as my PHEV, I still would have chosen the Honda Clarity PHEV, which while is not superior to the Volt, it is certainly superior to the Prime by a wide margin. Or even the Hyundai:
Compare Side-by-Side
The Clarity based on performance, room, and range, the Hyundai on price and range.
This is a little unfair. The Prius is clearly not designed to run in EV-only mode with its tiny battery, and it's even more obviously not designed for performance. The main reason why it's so slow when using the gas engine is that it runs in Atkinson cycle. This makes acceleration from a standstill very sluggish, but also makes the car significantly more efficient than most other ICE cars once you have reached cruising speed. As a result, the Prius gets 50+ MPG highway, whereas e.g. the Volt only gets around 41 MPG.To put the power issue in perspective, running both the gasoline and electric motors, the Prime hits 60mph in 10 seconds. Without gasoline, the Prime takes over 12 seconds. The Volt hits 60 in 7.5 seconds. Without the gasoline engine running.
If I sound like I'm picking on the Prius, there is reason.
If I would have never driven an EV/Hybrid except the Prius (which was true at one time), I'd still be all ICE today.
I believe the Prius did more damage to the environment than any other car. Why?
It taught a generation of drivers that 'green' meant slow, sluggish handling, goofy looking was the future of Green vehicles. It was a necessary evil. But that was not true.
You can drive green, and still have performance, style, and handling. That's what Tesla proved.
I'm never going to endorse a car that wraps itself in green cloak and pretends to be a super hero, when the green cloak is just there to hide that hideous sweater you received last Christmas.
That's true. I think the same applies to Toyota too, or any new car. The less someone spends on a reasonably fuel efficient hybrid or EV, or even an electric bicycle, and the more they spend on PV, the more CO2 they'll offset assuming they're replacing nothing but coal. Whether they'll replace mostly coal is regional though, so YMMV as usual.
This is a little unfair. The Prius is clearly not designed to run in EV-only mode with its tiny battery, and it's even more obviously not designed for performance. The main reason why it's so slow when using the gas engine is that it runs in Atkinson cycle. This makes acceleration from a standstill very sluggish, but also makes the car significantly more efficient than most other ICE cars once you have reached cruising speed. As a result, the Prius gets 50+ MPG highway, whereas e.g. the Volt only gets around 41 MPG.
It's short-hand for solar panels.Pardon my ignorance here, but what is PV?
The SR version of the Tesla toaster oven will do one slice of bread at a time. The LR version will do a whole loaf of bread at a time, in a shorter period, but will cost $900 more and use twice as much electricity to operate!I do too, but only if it is fully unlocked on day one.
Don't make me pay extra for the -L version of the toaster...
Clearly you haven't driven a Plug-in Prius for any length of time. Real world range is maybe 8-12+ miles depending on how you drive. Bicycle speeds would net ~20 miles of range. It's slower than the same gen Volt with a 11.3s 0-60 instead of 9.8s, and was designed with less electric range, but it also got much better mpg on gas.When the PHEV variant was released, it was a joke to appease CARB. 6 miles electric range if you crept along at bicycle speeds. Still NiMH. Toyota originally lied about the Prius power output and had to change it. Not sure if they are still lying. They also mislead folk by gaming the EPA system with their PHEVs. By completing only the loops they can complete under pure EV power and listing that as their MPGe EV mode, they can inflate their economy.
The SR version of the toaster oven will do one slice of bread at a time. The LR version will do a whole loaf of bread at a time, in a shorter period, but will cost $900 more and twice as much electricity to operate!
I don't know where you found a Gen 1 Volt that takes over 9 seconds to climb to 60mph. It takes about 8.5 seconds on a city street with the fresh factory tires at the recommended pressure, measured with a race computer is very accurate.Clearly you haven't driven a Plug-in Prius for any length of time. Real world range is maybe 8-12+ miles depending on how you drive. Bicycle speeds would net ~20 miles of range. It's slower than the same gen Volt with a 11.3s 0-60 instead of 9.8s, and was designed with less electric range, but it also got much better mpg on gas.
https://avt.inl.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/phev/fact2013toyotapriusphev.pdf
https://avt.inl.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/phev/fact2011chevroletvolt.pdf
I also wouldn't reference car mags for any performance figures. IMO, they're notorious for pushing them around any way they can.
You would talk differently if you had actual experience with the car.This is a little unfair. The Prius is clearly not designed to run in EV-only mode with its tiny battery, and it's even more obviously not designed for performance.
This is the only reason Toyota sells the Prime. Their CEO acknowledges that EVs make no sense, so they make a car just similar enough to a EV to be able to sell the thirstiest trucks on the market. They are exactly as green as the government forces them to be. Even when the Prius was released so that Toyota could become The Electric Hybrid Car and the Greenest Car Company, the Honda Insight was actually greener, but lost the Green Marketing contest to the dirtier car.
If I sound like I'm picking on the Prius, there is reason.
If I would have never driven an EV/Hybrid except the Prius (which was true at one time), I'd still be all ICE today.
I believe the Prius did more damage to the environment than any other car. Why?
It taught a generation of drivers that 'green' meant slow, sluggish handling, goofy looking was the future of Green vehicles. It was a necessary evil. But that was not true.
You can drive green, and still have performance, style, ard handling. That's what Tesla proved.
I'm never going to endorse a car that wraps itself in green cloak and pretends to be a super hero, when the green cloak is just there to hide that hideous sweater you received last Christmas.
I am sympathetic to this perspective, but the argument would be stronger if Tesla did not sell its ZEV credits to the truck manufacturers without their own compliance cars.This is the fundamental reason why buying a green car from a traditional automaker isn't green from a holistic point of view. These automakers, whether it's Chevy with the Bolt/Volt or Toyota with the Prius or Honda with the Clarity, sell fuel efficient cars in order to offset low MPG and highly profitable SUVs and trucks. They do this because they have to achieve the government mandated corporate average fuel economy. Therefore, when you buy a Bolt/Volt or Prius, you may yourself be lowering your carbon emissions, but you also enabled the automaker to sell a vehicle that cancelled out all of the high MPG and electric goodness of your vehicle. I understand that buying a Tesla before the $35k TM3 arrives may be financially unwise or impossible for some and am definitely not judging you for purchasing something else. I had a hard time convincing myself to pay $50k+ the TM3 and considered the alternatives as well. But at the same time, it's important to understand the business models of traditional automakers and the implications of purchasing a fuel efficient vehicle from a traditional automaker.