You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they were going to offer a hotspot they could and likely would do split-tunneling so the hotspot traffic wouldn't go back to the mothership. You wouldn't want to expose resources inside the VPN to the stuff connected to the hotspot anyway, so you have to provide differential treatment, and once you're doing that, why VPN the traffic at all? Just dump it out to the Internet.
Actually, this illustrates why prioritizing Wi-Fi hotspot is probably not a good use of their development time. It's hardly rocket science, but it's not completely trivial. For my part, I'd rather they spend the dev cycles on finally making the media player not suck, or on doing CarPlay. Both of those are more than just me-too check off items.
(N.b. the speed will of course never be better than LTE anyway since that all the car has. Except for older cars that only have 3G.)
$100/year seems very reasonable to me.
Since the car has WiFi, I wouldn't mind just using my own cell phone as a WiFi hotspot for the car (with the option to block certain types of data like software downloads or uploads, and instead run those on my home wifi at night).Agree, but is there anything preventing Tesla from jacking up the cost in the future? I could easily see them doubling or even tripling it a couple years down the road.
If they were going to offer a hotspot they could and likely would do split-tunneling so the hotspot traffic wouldn't go back to the mothership. You wouldn't want to expose resources inside the VPN to the stuff connected to the hotspot anyway, so you have to provide differential treatment, and once you're doing that, why VPN the traffic at all? Just dump it out to the Internet.
Starlink will obviate this in the future. I'm sure Elon will just make all Tesla cars hop on that and send some Tesla revenue to SpaceX.
Same here.I do too since I like it more than my old Audi.
I don't think anyone has answered this.It appears I am grandfathered, so I don't need to worry about the yearly fee, but I would have no problem paying $100 a year for Slacker. I have never heard of it before getting the Tesla, and I have read plenty of negative comments about it, but both my wife and I are pleasantly surprised by its appeal. We previously were paying $38 a month for Sirius in 2 different cars, and it sounded like *caca*. and it constantly cut out in the Infiniti while in mountainous areas. I was very happy to get rid of it. Slacker sounds so much better than Sirius, (128 kb vs 64 kb?) and I love the customizable radio stations and song skipping ability. At $8 a month it would be a bargain.
Tidal would be better, I have a family premium CD quality (1024 kb/s) account I pay $30 a month for through Roon for my home 2 channel system, but I don't think that bit rate could down load properly while streaming through Tesla's slow MCU.
Has anybody successfully used the browser with Tidal? Can it be done?
Agree, but is there anything preventing Tesla from jacking up the cost in the future? I could easily see them doubling or even tripling it a couple years down the road.
Awd option goes down for Model 3What the heck is going on here? Tesla charging for internet, Supercharger cost goes up, FSD post-delivery goes to up to $5K. What's next?
What the heck is going on here? Tesla charging for internet, Supercharger cost goes up, FSD post-delivery goes to up to $5K. What's next?
I was surprised by these. Piss off current owners in order to lower the cost of entry a bit?Awd option goes down for Model 3
Or not. Notice that nav in standard con package still gets all the information and uses it for routing, it just doesn't display it - so no difference in bandwidth costs. Same could apply for the app - will still connect and work as key or whatever, but if you want to control your car's HVAC or find it on an map, must pay for premium con package. The app may also let you view out of cameras some day, now that would be more bandwidth.While the article doesn't specify, mobile app access is not at all data heavy and is core to the vehicle (especially with the 3). So, I strongly suspect that app access will fall into the standard connectivity package.
Or not. Notice that nav in standard con package still gets all the information and uses it for routing, it just doesn't display it - so no difference in bandwidth costs.
I don't think so. I think the traffic routing is done off-car on a Tesla server, so the traffic data is only ever downloaded to the car to be displayed, not to be used for routing.
I was surprised by these. Piss off current owners in order to lower the cost of entry a bit?
What makes you think so? Car will route just fine even when offline (no google map, but works on IC). Are you saying the car routes differently when online vs. offline. If you plan a route while offline and then LTE connects, does it reroute?I don't think so. I think the traffic routing is done off-car on a Tesla server, so the traffic data is only ever downloaded to the car to be displayed, not to be used for routing.
I thought no AWD ones have shipped yet.I was surprised by these. Piss off current owners in order to lower the cost of entry a bit?