Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla bans Stewart Alsop from buying Model X

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I walked in the reveal like I was the only one with an invite
I'd skipped the Carl's Jr and I really wanted more than one bite
You kept us waiting - oh, so long
The world revolves just around me
Deluding myself that I'd get a Founder
I'd get a Founder, and...

I'm so mad, you probably think that post was about you
I used your name, I'll bet you think that post was about you
Don't you? don't you?

Thank you Carly. But for the record I went to Taco Bell a few hours before the event and finished it off at In and Out Burger afterwards, dining with the Tesla plant employees.:smile:
 
.........................

I don't like when Tesla "bans" someone or cancels their order, it's unfortunate. But there has to be more to this story than we know.

My take is that the original letter is written in an attention grabbing manner. Perhaps there were issues with the event, but an open letter to a CEO is not a professional way to address it. The letter comes across to me as bombastic, self centered and it lacks civil tone.


As some posters noted, a private communication regarding any complaint is more adequate and more adult way to seek resolution. It also has more chance of success.


The fact that the person chose an open letter as a channel of his complaints tells me that he is not after any resolution, he is more likely after publicity and attention, at Tesla's expense.


I agree with some posters that it is usually a good approach to try and fix the differences with disgruntled individuals. Unfortunately some individuals are quite damaging for the business and the business is much better off flicking them out. Also, very legitimate reason to ban some customers is that no one has to put up with the insults some people dish out under the cover of being customers.


Even if this blogger attacked unknown Tesla employee, flicking him off could be justifiable. He chose to attack CEO because that gets him more attention. Elon is part of Tesla's brand, any attack on him personally translates into attack on Tesla. In this case the decision to flick this individual seems to be a sound business decision.
 
My take is that the original letter is written in an attention grabbing manner. Perhaps there were issues with the event, but an open letter to a CEO is not a professional way to address it. The letter comes across to me as bombastic, self centered and it lacks civil tone.

Some might say you just described Elon Musk perfectly. :tongue:

You could argue that it is indeed the company that could have handled the whole situation better. The burden is always going to be on the company to take the higher road. Just address his concerns and move on. But no, a clash of egos prevents that.
 
It's a fact of business life. Sometimes you fire the vendor, sometimes you fire the customer.

It's not something you take lightly, or want to do, but on occasion it is the correct path.

<--- Not an FanBoy. Just wonder why folk today assume a business must always placate troublesome potential customers. At least it is still legal to choose your customers, much like customers can choose their supplier. Freedom doesn't suck as bad as some folk think.
 
I wasn't at the event, but I had a conversation the next day with one of the guys that were there (won't reveal his name, but he's arguably more connected/influential in the world than even Elon is, and wasting his time is a HUGE deal).

The similarity of what he told me the next day and the article is striking - it may as well have been written by the same person.

Elon simply doesn't respect other people's time - Steward isn't wrong about that.

Yeah Elon, we get it that your time is very valuable and sometimes people need to wait for you. But just think about who it is you're inviting to these events. Just a simple apology on the start would have worked wonders. Just to acknowledge that you respect your audience, and if you don't... just pretend to at least.
 
It's a fact of business life. Sometimes you fire the vendor, sometimes you fire the customer.

It's not something you take lightly, or want to do, but on occasion it is the correct path.

<--- Not an FanBoy. Just wonder why folk today assume a business must always placate troublesome potential customers. At least it is still legal to choose your customers, much like customers can choose their supplier. Freedom doesn't suck as bad as some folk think.

Agreed. Early on I decided to fire clients who I didn't like. It was one of the best business decisions I ever made.

There's a reason Elon Musk is where he is and it's not from making bad business decisions. Critics can cry "fanboy!" all they want -- they have to, since that's much easier than trying to argue with the extreme success of Elon Musk.

But to clarify your post, it's only legal to choose your customers if you do so without discrimination. Fortunately, being an @sshole is not a defined class that you are prohibited from discriminating against.

Just address his concerns and move on. But no, a clash of egos prevents that.

It's called nipping it in the bud. Just wait until this guy got his car, got service for his car, and the list goes on and on.

You can see my prophetic words in other threads about Tesla banning customers -- people said it wouldn't happen and it was a one-off when it first happened. Nope.
 
Last edited:
has to be said that if you buy a Tesla you deal with Tesla.
If you fall out with Tesla ...

if you buy any other car ... from a dealer
... at least you can use another dealer

Tesla's direct sales model is great and has a ton of advantages, but you do need to be aware of this
 
has to be said that if you buy a Tesla you deal with Tesla.
If you fall out with Tesla ...

if you buy any other car ... from a dealer
... at least you can use another dealer

Tesla's direct sales model is great and has a ton of advantages, but you do need to be aware of this

I dunno. I seem to remember someone talking about one of the Big Three manufacturers blacklisting customers.

I did a quick search & this post popped up first: I got put on a GM blacklist - NEED HELP PLEASE!!! - Corvette Forum

I went to order a 2015 Stingray and was informed by my dealer that my name (with address) shows up on some blacklist that GM has and says that I have (I guess illegally) exported a Corvette out of the country. He says that until I get off that list I cannot be sold a car.


It's a forum post, so the veracity of the situation isn't proven. But there are enough stories out there like that to cause me to question that a dealership network would prevent a manufacturer from blacklisting a potential buyer.
 
I dunno. I seem to remember someone talking about one of the Big Three manufacturers blacklisting customers.

I did a quick search & this post popped up first: I got put on a GM blacklist - NEED HELP PLEASE!!! - Corvette Forum



It's a forum post, so the veracity of the situation isn't proven. But there are enough stories out there like that to cause me to question that a dealership network would prevent a manufacturer from blacklisting a potential buyer.
On the bright side, with any other car company you can buy a used one and never deal with the manufacturer or their dealers ever again as any shop is allowed to work on them. With Tesla you have no alternatives for service.
 
On the bright side, with any other car company you can buy a used one and never deal with the manufacturer or their dealers ever again as any shop is allowed to work on them. With Tesla you have no alternatives for service.

Not for warranty items, unless you want to pay yourself. Plus, this is just the nature of new technology. It's like saying I can feed and water my horse, and fix my buggy, but those gas motors require a mechanic! I'm certain years from now all shops will be fixing out of warranty electric vehicles.
 
I have always felt that Tesla could do a better job screening customers....i.e. Local supercharger abusers, mooches who charge at stores while shopping, people demanding three hundred mile service calls for wiper blades, whiners, Etc.
 
<--- Not an FanBoy. Just wonder why folk today assume a business must always placate troublesome potential customers. At least it is still legal to choose your customers, much like customers can choose their supplier. Freedom doesn't suck as bad as some folk think.
Now we have evidence that Tesla is perfectly willing to terminate business relationship because of a bad blog post. Not even a lawsuit, just a blog post!

And with Tesla customers have nowhere else to go. Nothing stops Elon from denying you service or repairs if he thinks that you don't sound enthusiastic enough when talking about Tesla (assuming you don't have extended warranty). Or perhaps for jailbreaking your car's central console.

So I'm now considering the "direct sales" model to be a huge disadvantage compared to regular independent car dealers model (funny enough, I've had no issues with car dealers in the past).
 
Banned by Tesla

Now we have evidence that Tesla is perfectly willing to terminate business relationship because of a bad blog post. Not even a lawsuit, just a blog post!

And with Tesla customers have nowhere else to go. Nothing stops Elon from denying you service or repairs if he thinks that you don't sound enthusiastic enough when talking about Tesla (assuming you don't have extended warranty). Or perhaps for jailbreaking your car's central console.

So I'm now considering the "direct sales" model to be a huge disadvantage compared to regular independent car dealers model (funny enough, I've had no issues with car dealers in the past).

If you only had one Chevy dealer in your city and you did a blog post that gained widespread attention where you blasted the owner of the dealership do you think they'd gladly sell you a car?
 
Last edited: