You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, picked up shares and sold with a $2.6 dollar swing from 9:44 Am and sold at 10:26 Am. Easy $500.
Me too! .............Cost was minimal. I am standing 'pat' on my stock/Leap positions through at least the reveal. I am not afraid to change strategies if we get a 5-10% move up prior to the reveal.
I still am sitting on more 'TSLA cash' than usual. That could certainly be a big mistake, but analysis paralysis has set in on what to do with that money.
Disclaimer: 90% of my TSLA money is in a retirement account so I do not worry about tax consequences.
Please everyone, it's been requested before. TSLA short term price movement comments only. All other discussions, albeit worthwhile, should be performed on a new thread. Thank you.
This strength today, if nothing else, you might make off on IV and build up to Thursday alone (assuming you sell off any of those lotto tickets). Even carrying through the event, if we can get the price up around 240 by thursday, those calls will likely be sitting ok to avoid too much IV crush after the event assuming we propel upward.
The really great thing about today's price action is I don't have to worry about anyone saying that there are gaps to fill as it looks to me like everything is filled in at the moment, so if we just slowly go up to 240 by Thursday, everything will be perfect for the event to be set up as well as can be expected.
I reserve the right to sell off if things get too hot again, but assuming that we stop today in the 233-234 range, do another 2-3 dollars tomorrow, another 2-3 dollars on Wed, I will be happy to let Thursday play out as it wants. Normally I would be cautious up until the Thursday close. But we might see an early rise based on the turnout of people at the stores ahead of the event.
Keep in mind. Shareholders and the Market are not going to care about the actual product. They are going to care how the overall consumer cares about the product and the associated number of deposits made. It can be the worst looking car in the world, with 0 features, and if Tesla says that they had 100k deposits on this terrible looking car all because it has 200+ miles of range, then the market will be overly happy with that. It's the deposits to watch... nothing else. Which is why lines outside of stores can have an impact here during the day on Thursday.
***My trading right now is as follows:
I have all of 8% of my "play money" in options right now. The rest is just waiting to see what happens after Thursday. I have been burned too many times from events and especially the associated IV crush (assuming that we even go positive... that is even worse of an affect to get the direction wrong AND have IV crush, you might as well write everything off as a total loss) to be willing to risk it. If we go positive after the event then I will dump into options more heavily.
To avoid a total loss of movement, I do have around 70% of that "play money" as actual shares. Since shares don't suffer from an IV crush, and we got the dip I was expecting to happen. I feel comfortable in sticking this capital in shares to have some positive affect from this event.
This leaves me with ~20% cash to push into options on the 1st (best case) up to around the 4th in the event that it doesn't look like it is going to stick until we get the Q1 numbers.
I'll consider dumping out of shares to leverage as additional options depending on the ferocity of the price action.
Wow Julian that is complicated analogy. Just other analogies of actual incumbants that could not adjust work:
I would argue Blockbuster never really messed up. They tried (if I recall) to do disks in the mail and streaming(? Not an expert) they just could not torch their whole business and rebuild it as a Netflix killer. There was never a time they had that option. Senior management needed to focus on *this* quarter. By the time it was clear that they HAD to defeat Netflix they lacked the resources to do so.
I like the Blockbuster analogy. Except that BB did mess up by passing the chance to acquire Netflix when it was offered.
Blockbuster's CEO once passed up a chance to buy Netflix for only $50 million
In a similar circumstance, I'd like to think NOW is that chance for ICE manufacturers to take up on the offer to shift their focus to vehicle electrification. Don't think it's yet too late.
You seem to think this makes a difference. Why should it matter who the owner is or what country they live in. Thus US has been exporting used vehicles to Mexico and other countries for quite some time. If your dealer has to export your trade-in vehicle, you get a lower trade in value. This in turn makes it more expensive to buy or lease your new car. So demand for new ICE cars falls off just as resale values on used ICE cars fall off. So new ICE cars come down in price or quantity sold.Here is the results of a 60 second web search for the anticipated existence of a used car sluice gate:
Automobiles – Lucrative opportunities you can exploit in Africa’s huge and rapidly growing vehicle market - Smallstarter Africa
Nigeria alone, $5 billion annually, mainly used from US, Canada and EU.
@jhm Here is the EV displacement that you have been modelling at a guess - but don't despair Oil and ICE is definitely screwed regardless. Just a different mechanism. Just to note that it has drastically different implications for assumptions for near to mid term Oil futures because where these cars go, oil consumption can surely follow. Worth double checking who is pulling whose leg when it comes to the notion of EVs displacing oil demand.
Stock is performing nominally today. All good. I think it is a good idea to make informed decisions about the meaning of forthcoming event. Not easy to appreciate the meaning of a car that undercuts the price of a technology that has been an unassailable monopoly for a hundred years. Shame to be one of the ones dumbfounded on the wrong side of the trade.
In a similar circumstance, I'd like to think NOW is that chance for ICE manufacturers to take up on the offer to shift their focus to vehicle electrification. Don't think it's yet too late.
By creating and investing heavily into a new brand-name that is financially independent on the old one and free to eat the lunch of the old one.How??
off topic or on topic, you decide
I couldn't agree more...
and around this subject I have created a new thread.."What if M3 came with a Powerwall?
Warning: it is not for everyone, but a few may be interested.
Enjoy
Picked up 20 june 16 $245 at $12.05Did anyone else pick up some cheap short term plays during amateur hour?
How?
If you price a well appointed EV considerably above the market for a similar ICE car, customers have no incentive to pay the premium. They can just reserve and buy a Model 3 instead. For example the GM Bolt is half the value for money compared with a GM Sonic. I'm sure some people will lease them while waiting for their Model 3 order to mature but it would make no sense at all to buy one. When the leases Expire, GM will get back most of their Bolt production off lease with negligible resale value - but if you buy one or worse still take a balloon-ended vehicle loan on one, you end up with a Bolt with negligible resale value or worse still negative equity on a car loan balloon payment and then its just to pay up money for nothing under threat of a repossession.
If you price a well appointed EV under the price of similar ICE vehicles so as to compete head to head with the Model 3, customers have no remaining incentive to chose an ICE vehicle at all (and plenty of incentive not to). If you need to sell 9 million ICE vehicles per year to cover your overheads with barely a 5% net profit to spare - obsoleting ICE vehicles in the eyes of your customer base to chase a hard to quantify share of an impossible to quantify EV market is a bit of a tricky thing to do.
Many people share fluffy assumptions about all this, but nobody can answer this question. How??
So if we assume that in a few days the majority of ICE vehicles will be obsolete but the majority of drivers won't be able to buy a BEV for several years... What will they do? Pay lots of money in repairs as their car starts to fall apart? Take a bus? Who will step in to fill the void? What number of reservations will cause upheaval of our financial system? This reminds me of Y2K.
How?
If you price a well appointed EV considerably above the market for a similar ICE car, customers have no incentive to pay the premium. They can just reserve and buy a Model 3 instead. For example the GM Bolt is half the value for money compared with a GM Sonic. I'm sure some people will lease them while waiting for their Model 3 order to mature but it would make no sense at all to buy one. When the leases Expire, GM will get back most of their Bolt production off lease with negligible resale value - but if you buy one or worse still take a balloon-ended vehicle loan on one, you end up with a Bolt with negligible resale value or worse still negative equity on a car loan balloon payment and then its just to pay up money for nothing under threat of a repossession.
If you price a well appointed EV under the price of similar ICE vehicles so as to compete head to head with the Model 3, customers have no remaining incentive to chose an ICE vehicle at all (and plenty of incentive not to). If you need to sell 9 million ICE vehicles per year to cover your overheads with barely a 5% net profit to spare - obsoleting ICE vehicles in the eyes of your customer base to chase a hard to quantify share of an impossible to quantify EV market is a bit of a tricky thing to do.
Many people share fluffy assumptions about all this, but nobody can answer this question. How??