SSD420
Member
So none mentioned in this thread are superchargers?I think you are correct but that is a different thread, the chargers being discussed in this thread are not Tesla supercharges.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So none mentioned in this thread are superchargers?I think you are correct but that is a different thread, the chargers being discussed in this thread are not Tesla supercharges.
If you think about it, the government wouldn't pay for a L3 charger which most EVs can't use.So none mentioned in this thread are superchargers?
I guess that's true. I wish motor superchargers would be put in place. The one thing that I can't seem to get over, is the need to wait for my car to Charge.If you think about it, the government wouldn't pay for a L3 charger which most EVs can't use.
*more (oops, sorry I just woke up)I guess that's true. I wish motor superchargers would be put in place. The one thing that I can't seem to get over, is the need to wait for my car to Charge.
If you think about it, the government wouldn't pay for a L3 charger which most EVs can't use.
I always get the impression that the mainstream auto manufacturers are being dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. They'd rather do anything else but make EVs.Agreed, but only because governments think short-term. Tesla has already cornered upwards of 60% of the EV market. In 5 or 10 years that could bump up to 75 or 80% and other companies may opt to use their open charging standard (the best one, by far, of those presently available).
McDonald's is a franchise system and they signed up for dozens of fast chargers in the new program, so it's easier done than you claim.
I guess that's true. I wish motor superchargers would be put in place. The one thing that I can't seem to get over, is the need to wait for my car to Charge.
In the next few years we will transition to Ev's with larger batteries, making L2 charging not relevant, except for destination charging. This should be taken into account when planning these new locations. Really it should be L3 unless at a parking lot, hotel, or other attraction with a minimum 3 hour stay.
Which non-proprietary fast charging standard would you have mandated?But they should have mandated L3s at 100kw.
At the same time, we can agree that it's crazy each fast charging location has, in most cases, no redundancy for chargers. So it goes without saying that the job is not truly done. But it's a great step forward, and gives us good value and good geographic coverage in the mean time.At a minimum they should have mandated that the power distribution to the charger units be capable of 100 kw so that the charger pedestals could easily be swapped out at some point.
Tesla has about 35% of the Canadian EV market (not including plug-in hybrids). I'm not hating; diversity is a good thing.Agreed, but only because governments think short-term. Tesla has already cornered upwards of 60% of the EV market. In 5 or 10 years that could bump up to 75 or 80% and other companies may opt to use their open charging standard (the best one, by far, of those presently available).
Model S 639 36%
Leaf 617 35%
Soul EV 250 14%
Others 261 15%
Total 1767 100%
Even the 50kw L3 that we will be getting in Ontario is really only a desperation charger. With a 90kw Tesla you're looking at half of a charge in in nearly an hour. I do applaud Ontario's effort; it's one of the few good things that this government has done. But they should have mandated L3s at 100kw.
...can't beat a 4,000 km trip at an energy cost of $24.95!
At the same time, we can agree that it's crazy each fast charging location has, in most cases, no redundancy for chargers. So it goes without saying that the job is not truly done. But it's a great step forward, and gives us good value and good geographic coverage in the mean time.