The discussion on this thread has been informative and for the most part, respectful. I appreciate that. Interesting perspectives all around.
I suspect that when the final report comes out there will be plenty of blame/criticism for everyone - CalTrans, driver, and Tesla AP. I have some suggestions for Tesla to make AP safer until FSD is a reality. I'm sure that my suggestions will garner accusations of 'big brother' from some forum members, but the discussion is worth it. Don't give me a 'disagree', tell me why you disagree. A person lost their life probably due to a perfect storm of unfortunate concurrent events. I don't want anyone, particularly a member of this forum, to lose your life even if I have you on 'ignore' because you voted for someone different for President than I did! Here goes:
- Change the name of the AP system, maybe something like "Tesla Pilot" or "Don't Panic" or 'BFPilot', not that it makes any difference but to make things crystal clear to some people.
- AP automatically disengages above the posted speed limit, whether it be 25 or 85 mph. AP is not available if speed is greater than posted. Car will still function properly and normally, but you, the driver, are in total manual control.
- Make following distance a function of vehicular speed. The faster you go, the greater the following distance. You can set your following distance greater than the default at a given speed, but you can't set it for less.
- Require that at least one hand be on the steering wheel at all times, otherwise AP disengages immediately. Perhaps cover the wheel in alcantara so drivers will want to leave their hands on the wheel.
- Both visual and audio warning signals be more robust when AP senses a situation that is potentially dangerous or when it becomes confused.
Any other ideas?
Some counter points along with alternative solutions.
1.) The only people who seem to confused by the AP name are people who don't own the car. In fact I think the name helped bring attention to accidents that are likely occurring with Level 2 semi-autonomous cars. We don't know about them because the media doesn't report them nearly to the level that it does an AP related accident. As a good example the first "hey, look no hands and I'm in the backseat" wasn't done with a Tesla. It was done in an Infiniti. People only remember it being done in a Tesla because of the publicity.
Alternative -> Have a campaign/competition to create a small video of how AP works, and what it's limitations are. Where the video is fun, and grabs peoples attention. Before a customer is allowed to enable AP (for the first time in settings) make them watch it on the center console. We have too many among us that don't know the AP system can't see stopped cars.
2.) This is a non-starter in a lot of states where the speed limit is purposely lower than what people travel at.
Alternative - None, as this hasn't been a contributing factor. They also already do this on non-divided roads where they limit it to 5 over, and that's pretty close to the speed limit anyways (considering the car normally reads high).
3.) Again this is a non-starter in some states where people drive stacked up on each other because that's how they like it. I dunno why, but that's what they do. TACC already uses speed as a function to some degree. In fact I use a setting of 5 when going slow, and a setting of 3 when going at speed. Why? cause 3 while going slow tends to get me closer than I prefer. This tends to be where people are changing lanes a lot so I just let people do whatever.
4.) This won't work as the torque sensor itself doesn't work well enough. For some people it doesn't register that our hands are there. Plus just because a persons hands are at the wheel doesn't mean they're paying attention.
Alternative - Remove the nags, and purely go based on AP confidence. Of course this is a non-starter as everyone is so obsessed with nags. I think this causes people to not take them seriously. Personally I'd prefer a "take the wheel" followed by a "GOD DAMMIT. I told you to take the WHEEL". Okay, that might frighten people into an accident.
5.) I agree with, but I have some additional suggestions. This car really needs a HUD where the information can be more easily seen. I would also indicate whether AP tiles are loaded for the specific section of road.
When it really comes down it I don't think Tesla can do a whole lot without improving the system. They have tried to add "safety" things, but then they end up pulling them because of some major downside that they didn't think of.
At the end of the day It simply needs to work better. There is no getting around that.
The entire purpose of having a machine do it (even with human supervision) is if it screws up you fix the problem. That way you fix it once, and it's done.
Everything else is a "hey, this might reduce the chances" kind of things.
As to those of you that think people should pay attention when driving. I do agree with you, but that's not the point. Like Volvo has the goal of no fatalities in their cars by 2020. There is no exception for drivers who aren't paying attention.
We can't get beat by Volvo. Who wants a Volvo?
Disclaimer - I did kind of want a Volvo. They're not bad these days.