(being facetious, but still).
No, I think there is a lot of truth in that.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(being facetious, but still).
I don't think they have that kind of expertise.I don't understand why Fisker isn't developing it's own engine...
I don't think they have that kind of expertise.
No, I think there is a lot of truth in that.
I don't think they have that kind of expertise.
About a week before Franfurt, here's a teaser image of the Fisker Surf:
Fisker Surf | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
I suppose this is the shooting-brake/wagon version of the Karma, which apparently you can mount a surfboard on top.
I don't understand what the hold up is. The standard for PHEVs has already set for the Chevy Volt. Apply those same standard to the Karma and poof you have the MPGe and MPG. I'm thinking that Fisker altering the exhaust system last minute might have caused the Karma's testing to have to be started all over again.
And that just shows again that Fisker seems unable to deal with the issues of actually producing a car. He is outsourcing most work and still he gets stuff wrong again and again. This really shows that Tesla has done much better work using experienced car people and still manages to do things their own way.I say that's most likely the case.
Well to be fair, Tesla had its share of issues as well, and actually producing a car is an immense undertaking. From what I've heard about the Nina, it sounds like Fisker is learning from some of their Karma mistakes. Of course in the meantime, they have to ship the vehicle they have (which has some inherent flaws).
I too am curious to see how well Fisker holds up. Particularly since they have a $0.5B gov't loan (and given the recent failure of another similarly sized loan recipient).
A distinct possibility. Their sales goals seem rather optimistic (again so were the Roadster's). If Fisker does fail, though, that would suck for the DOE (and the tax payer). I for one, wish them much success and hope they make the best cars they can. I think there's plenty of room in the luxury PHEV space, though the odds are against them.I'm guessing Fisker will bite the dust because of the fact that there is little to no chance of selling their vehicles at their price point and in the numbers needed to stay afloat.
Well to be fair, Tesla had its share of issues as well, and actually producing a car is an immense undertaking. From what I've heard about the Nina, it sounds like Fisker is learning from some of their Karma mistakes. Of course in the meantime, they have to ship the vehicle they have (which has some inherent flaws).
I too am curious to see how well Fisker holds up. Particularly since they have a $0.5B gov't loan (and given the recent failure of another similarly sized loan recipient).
If Fisker does fail, though, that would suck for the DOE (and the tax payer).
I don't know all the details. But supposedly they used some of the money for Karma engineering which was done in California. Also they already bought the Nina plant, though they haven't done much there yet.I'd guess that they've gotten very little of the $.5 billion to date.
but at least now you can take a trip and not have to flip your undies inside out lol.
I don't know all the details. But supposedly they used some of the money for Karma engineering which was done in California. Also they already bought the Nina plant, though they haven't done much there yet.
Given the Congressional hearings that are going on right now because of Solyndra, I would say the exact opposite, especially if there is evidence of something fishy/political.There was something fishy (read: political) with that buy anyway, so if Fisker fails, I sort of doubt the powers that be really care.