AnxietyRanger
Well-Known Member
So, to answer the question I posed to you...it didn't actually help you to decide whether to confirm your X reservation or not. But it did give you MORE to consider, as I suggested speculation does.
Putting one's head in the sand like the proverbial ostrich is certainly a viable purchase satisfaction strategy at times. I use it myself too sometimes, what you don't know may not hurt you - avoiding forums is a good way to not find out things to watch out for and chances are one won't notice them themselves.
That said, IF one wants to know about their purchase as much as possible and make an educated choice - or know they'll be unhappy if they miss something - that strategy works much worse. Because in that case you can either think much pre-purchase or do it anyway post-purchase. Doing the thinking beforehand gives you more and less costly options.
That is a big pile of smelly. Back on topic, none of the people receiving their Founders X on Sept 29 care about speculation. And none of the Sig or production reservation holders have to confirm their Model X prior to seeing, feeling and driving one if that's what they require before deciding.AnxietyRanger said:Tesla isn't talking - and even when they are, their interests aren't aligned with our interests, as they don't want to tell about future product changes that we as buyers might have an interest in finding out. That leaves unofficial and communal channels as the alternative.
The Founders' don't care because they have insider information anyway. As for Signature reservation holders, it remains to be seen how open Tesla is about possible soon-after Signature model features at the launch. Maybe they will go into detail as well as lay out the roadmap for the first year, in which case speculation on it would be less pertinent.
My point stands in general, though: Companies have an interest not keeping their customers informed of product changes (and, in some cases, product limitations) - and customers have an interest in knowing. It would be unreasonable to ask the company to go against their interest, but equally it would be unreasonable to then ask the customer to just blindly take the company's word for things. Thus we need unofficial data like leaks and community analysis/speculation to balance things out.
The rest of your post was wasted on me. You knew it would be knowing that I prefer to communicate without all the extra verbiage, just as I know you dislike it when I parse your posts and/or answer with one word sentences.
As I said, the community pressure cooker on developing thoughts requires we actually discuss those thoughts. Reverting to comments on style, person or funny pictures some others use does not develop those thoughts - hence my dislike. As for comparing our posts, at least you have longer explanations to understand me from were you to so desire, I have often much less to go by with the cryptic one-liner responses I get.