You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, they are saying its two issues. One is greenhouse gas emessions and the second one is animal cruelty.
(the thread was kind of nasty. It's an example of green-on-green violence. TM doesn't have to be perfect to be a leader. TM shouldn't be held to a different standard. TM should compare themselves to the industry, not to perfection --my view.)
I hope people realize that between the board and institutional shareholders, they have a majority vote. So individual shareholder votes are irrelevant.
Seriously, what's with the venom from other commenters here? People are saying it's a waste of time to let the shareholder proposals get presented in front of the shareholder meeting? That's literally the point of all this...
It sounds to me that the "green-on-green violence" is coming from us here. How about we not do that.
The presentation was well-thought-out and based in reality. I don't see the problem and neither should any of you.
I hope Tesla institutes the proposal at some point, sooner rather than later even if it doesn't happen immediately. And I'm not a vegan.
There is certainly a cost factor to providing more options and they likely have chosen that it isn't worth it at this point to continue to offer such things.