EVNow
Well-Known Member
No, we don’t have many of those like you do in FL.You must not be making many ULT's into divided highways.
BTW, we are planning to move to FL this summer - so I can make a long term comparison between two geos.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, we don’t have many of those like you do in FL.You must not be making many ULT's into divided highways.
Keeping the lanes is the highlight of Tesla AP/FSD. I am shocked to read someone has issues with it. Are we sure they are not driving a Mercedes? SeriouslyI think almost all of us have had this experience. So, you are the outlier here claiming perfect drives for weeks.
It is not a “lane keeping” issue in the sense of Ford blue etc. This is where intentionally FSD is driving to one side of the lane (for whatever reason) and sometimes going over the edge. For eg., yesterday FSD was driving almost on the right line of the two lane road because there was a F150 driving on the left lane. In general I’d only go that far away if it’s a huge truck, not F150. So, FSD needs more specific training to learn this offset rule like humans do.
I was able to click through to the link that describes the different levels at the direct source:Yes I saw that reddit post, but I don’t consider it as a reliable source
Unless there is some link behind the paywall.
I think you meant " their effect affect"There, there. Don't let their affect affect you.
Not counting driving within parking lots, I would say more than 90% of my disengagements have NOT been to prevent behavior that would cause an accident. A vast majority of them are because it's signaling to go into a lane I don't want it to, because it's going too fast, because it feels like it's changing lanes too late for a turn, or because it's not going around a slower car and it cancelled a manually-initiated lane change halfway through.If every other of those disengagements would have lead to an accident (if car was driving autonomously), the current rate would be one accident every 40 miles. If driver normally is involved in an accident every 400 000 miles, that distance needs to be 10 000 times higher.
So if disengagement doubles every year it would reach 400 000 in approximately 13 years. Seems plausible. If the actual accident rate now autonomously would be 1 in 100 miles, then we would reach parity already in 12 years!
Your job should also be to not get in other people's way where reasonable without compromising safety. I'm not talking about pulling over for people going 100 mph down a surface street. I'm talking about taking excessively long pauses at stop signs, driving 5-10 mph below the speed limit, etc...things which are relatively common on v12.3.My job as a driver is to ensure my safety, not worry about impatient drivers running over to get a quickie with their girlfriend
As long as the shoulder is paved, what does it matter? I drive on rural 2-lane roads with high speed limits (45-50 mph) often. Whenever a car is coming from the other direction, I always slide over if there is paved shoulder and there aren't any potholes to avoid. Not a dramatic amount, but going onto or slightly over the line is no big deal to reduce the chance of a head-on collision. An F-150 slamming into you at a 100mph closure rate is a less-than-pleasant experience.I think almost all of us have had this experience. So, you are the outlier here claiming perfect drives for weeks.
It is not a “lane keeping” issue in the sense of Ford blue etc. This is where intentionally FSD is driving to one side of the lane (for whatever reason) and sometimes going over the edge. For eg., yesterday FSD was driving almost on the right line of the two lane road because there was a F150 driving on the left lane. In general I’d only go that far away if it’s a huge truck, not F150. So, FSD needs more specific training to learn this offset rule like humans do.
Are you joking? Driving recklessly would fall into this category, not driving within regulations. That being said, I have not experienced a road rage event yet. You Probably need to move to a better place.Your job should also be to not get in other people's way where reasonable without compromising safety.
For me it's once every several thousand miles now. I'm a bit north and west of Boston so I avoid a lot of the more difficult driving closer to the city.Not counting driving within parking lots, I would say more than 90% of my disengagements have NOT been to prevent behavior that would cause an accident. A vast majority of them are because it's signaling to go into a lane I don't want it to, because it's going too fast, because it feels like it's changing lanes too late for a turn, or because it's not going around a slower car and it cancelled a manually-initiated lane change halfway through.
For me, the disengagement rate to avoid an accident is more like once every several hundred miles on v12.3.6.
Btw I love the courtesy moves by 12.3.6
There, there. Don't let their affect affect you.
No I think he had it right.I think you meant " their effect affect"
Brother!!! When you make it to Florida let everyone know.No, we don’t have many of those like you do in FL.
BTW, we are planning to move to FL this summer - so I can make a long term comparison between two geos.
Be careful with posts like this that some people find subjective...No I think he had it right.
Affect as a noun (pronounced AF-fect). A purposeful and somewhat over-expressed response or demeanor, put on for effect.
Like an over-the-top actor delivering a line or a comedian playing for the laugh.
Or on the internet, an emoji to communicate the tone - the affect.
It can be a good or a bad thing, but sometimes annoying. Sometimes when a person is prone to a put-on accent or demeanor, people will say that's an affectation.
I thought @APotatoGod used it purposefully and cleverly there. Good but uncommon word, and I know that the clever joke is diminished by having tto explain it.
Thanks you're right. I was just defending a fellow forum member, while trying to avoid offending anyone else.Be careful with posts like this that some people find subjective...
It could awaken the beast, with 10 pages of the definition of the word "is" !!!
Mine still does it, I thought they made like that on purpose to give cars in the other lane time to respond to your lane changeV12.3.6 almost completely eliminated the FSD Wiggle for me.
Are you one of those people who stops with their cart right in the middle of the aisle at the grocery store, completely blocking the lane while you decide whether you want Cheerios or Golden Grams for breakfast?Are you joking? Driving recklessly would fall into this category, not driving within regulations. That being said, I have not experienced a road rage event yet. You Probably need to move to a better place.
Based on how long it took them to merge the city and highway stacks before I suspect you are correct.Seems likely, but as I said, just no incentive.
Obviously going to take a year or so before they're ready for that and they'll need the valuable FSD miles for their graphs well before that. Best possible function is not the priority!!!
Yep, FSD definitely lets cars in - very polite. Most of the time it’s fine but I’m careful and I have closed the gap a couple of times when I didn’t think it was safe using a little pressure on the accelerator. I’ve also experienced the not blocking an intersection behavior.I had a similar experience the other day when a car wanted to pull out from a CVS parking across 2 lanes to turn left. FSD stopped short of the line of cars in front of me and let the car cross to make the turn. At first I wasn't sure why FSD stopped until I saw the car trying to come out. I was shocked but in a good way.
V12 also consistently avoids pulling into intersections at lights to avoid blocking traffic in case the light turns red.