willow_hiller
Well-Known Member
I quote the article:
"... people with higher IQs are actually more susceptible to the gambler’s fallacy than people who score less well on standardised tests. It could be that the more intelligent people overthink the patterns and believe that they are smart enough to predict what comes next."
I'm seeing patterns everywhere!!!
Just sayin'
If the Gambler's Fallacy is the faulty assumption that events aren't statistically independent, one also needs to be wary of the opposite.
Assuming that negative events would be statistically independent was one of the causes of the 2008 financial collapse. Too many quants thinking: "Sure, this mortgage has a high probability of default, but if I bundle it together in a security with hundreds of other mortgages, that will significantly decrease the risk." What they failed to realize was that the chance of default for one mortgage was influenced by the same factors that would cause the others to default as well...