You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope not! That would be an excellent way to tank the SP!
1.You realize that the market reasons by analogy?
2. What happened the last time that Tesla produced a CUV based on a sedan at the same time?
I'd consider selling all of our calls and buying puts!
You realize that your reply didn't address either of my points?Tesla *hasn't* produced a CUV based on a sedan at the same time for simultaneous release before.
Sure, Model X had a boatload of delays, but there is no reason to believe that should be true of Model Y any more than it is of Model 3 (which is to say that its not, because there is a completely different mentality at play.)
I would think that expanding the product line from 2 products to 4 in one fell swoop would be a good thing, not a bad thing. And with TMTBTM behind it all? I have to believe that its being designed to just be able to start to build MY when its ready.
https://solarbonds.solarcity.com/assets/bond_document/184/?filename=prospectus
Musk & cousins buying $100M of $124M offering.
https://solarbonds.solarcity.com/assets/bond_document/184/?filename=prospectus
Musk & cousins buying $100M of $124M offering.
Sounds great but if you do the math, which I won't repeat again [ already explained to Julian and others at great length and detail], the increase in capacity due to increased cell diameter is exactly matched by the reduction in the number of cells. They do gain about 7% due to the increased cell length.EDIT: Before someone says why not just keep making the cells bigger, there are other constraints on total pack efficiency. If you make the cells a larger diameter, you waste more of the overall pack volume on the air gaps between the cells because they don't fit together perfectly.
Bingo! The larger format cells are largely about cost reductions.racer26 said:RE-EDIT: There is 1.49x the active material volume in the 21-70 as in the 18650. Theoretically, you should be able to use 66% of the number of cells to come out with the same capacity. Depending on how much of the cost is packaging of the cell vs active material cost, that could add up to big savings when spread over a pack's worth of cells.
I'm not sure how to feel about this.
https://solarbonds.solarcity.com/assets/bond_document/184/?filename=prospectus
Musk & cousins buying $100M of $124M offering.
The way I read it is it is hard to borrow money from outside. Hence, insiders specially Musk is purchasing them.I'm not sure how to feel about this.
Obviously they consider these to be a solid investment or they wouldn't park their money in them, but at the same time the optics aren't great.
Maybe I should buy a few.
A bit OT, but do any of you know where I could get the opening and closing prices of TSLA of last few years in one table?
The way I read it is it is hard to borrow money from outside. Hence, insiders specially Musk is purchasing them.
Musk has something up his sleeve for sure. Likely reason for after hours move. Good point!!Anyone else wondering why
I'm viewing this as a sign the merger will happen soon, and Elon is confident Tesla's stock will go much higher. SolarCity bonds aren't reflecting the reality about SolarCity or Tesla. When the merger is complete, they will be converted to Tesla bonds and will look like a no brainier investment.
A new design and layout of packs with the old cell format. Not sure how that's relevant for the M3.I think one significant point in today's announcement is that Tesla is starting to produce the new pack. And they have 11 months of practice before the earliest not possible date for Model 3. Even though production rate now is only 200/week, it's good to fine tune the lines with so much time. This is significant because the battery cells and battery pack are the two most important components in the 3 and are also the two most different components compared to the S (excluding the new P100D). Should help a lot for next year's initial ramp up.
Unless Tesla is going to redesign all the cooling devices, pack format, electronics in the pack again in a year, this pack will be able to suit old and new cells IMO. And I very much doubt they are designing this pack specifically for the P100D. Having time to reiterate a new design is good for reliability and cost.A new design and layout of packs with the old cell format. Not sure how that's relevant for the M3.
Plus I don't think it's necessary for them to practice with the new packs anyway.