I want to amend my previous post. Since blocking the w's fantasies (reluctantly, never blocked anyone on any forum before) I am not dissatisfied with the content of the thread except that I miss FluxCap's and Jesse's posts.
Example of OT content I like:
Very valuable, thanks! But I don't see any short-term relevance.
And I hope that both Julian and JHM continue to post. I have benefited from both of their contributions.
Moving on to responding to specific posts...
I am equally surprised by the fact that Julian thinks the following is even plausible, and the fact that he is so positive it's correct...
IMO he is subject to the error that JB mentioned (paraphrasing) "people think because batteries have always been expensive, that they will always be expensive". He also said:
The only reason EV's are more expensive than ICEv's is the price of batteries (motors, invertors ands BMS"s are not that expensive or difficult). EV's will dominate as battery prices fall. Tesla has at least a 5-10 year headstart, but at some point every OEM will be able to build EV's for less than they build gas cars. If you don't think OEM's are well positioned to do that look at how long it's taking Tesla to ramp production to 100k.
And electricity will be less expensive. Why will anyone continue to buy old ICEv's when the costs of fuel and maintenance are so much higher?
Disagree. IMO the main thing that differentiates Tesla-EM from Nissan-Ghosn is the superior vision and boldness of Tesla-EM.
MitchJi, you've got the reason behind the first statement I've bolded, it's listed just a bit farther down in your own post, which I've also bolded.
Why will anyone continue to buy old ICE's when the costs are so much higher (and add to that list: performance is worse, and space is less)? How can the current auto makers survive if all of a sudden, buyers change their minds overnight as to what makes a vehicle purchase compelling?
Remember that a seven percent drop in demand during the Great Recession caused two bankruptcies. Why, then, would you think that the ICE manufacturers will be able to survive a complete retooling for an overnight change in expectations regarding what a vehicle should have?
The current automakers have exactly three core competencies:
1) ICE manufacturing tooling and factories
2) Transmission manufacturing tooling and factories
3) Vehicle assembly and distribution
The new transportation solution doesn't require the first two on that list. Even all of the important components of the Bolt, like the battery pack, controllers, motor and infotainment as outsourced to LG. GM has improved their capabilities in the future EV landscape by exactly zero.
The Innovators Dilemma unfortunately suggests an inescapable truth: without creating a NewCo subdivision designed to operate as an EV startup and compete with the parent company, the parent company instead dabbles in the new technology without being able to divert the proper attention and resources to the project to allow it to usurp all of the rest of the product lines.