TSLA is tricky. Nothing about it is conventional. What went wrong was I assumed at first the top of the rally was on Feb 16th, before pulling it back to Feb 9th. I didn't even entertain the possibility of Feb 28th being the top because conventionally it wasn't. Feb 16th peak was 217 so there's that. Feb 9th peak was only 214 but in a bullish consolidation phase, the correction can overshoot the rally peak a little bit so later on I counted 214 as the top, as the sideway consolidation leading up to it fits the guidelines better. I'm talking about blue 3-4.
View attachment 925561
The problem with counting Feb 9th or 16th as the top of the rally was the subsequent correction that ended at 164 on March 13th appeared much longer than it really was. In EWT, the correction should only take 38% - 62%, or 100% in rare cases, of the duration of the rally. So if we take Feb 9th or Feb 16th as top of the rally, then Feb 9th - March 13th and Feb 16th - March 13th would appear to have fallen into the appropriate time window. That and 164 being only $4 shy of the 50% retracement mark (160) put the possibility of it being the bottom on the table. Later on when TSLA broke out of 206 last Friday I was certain that 164 was the bottom.
Another guideline that would be ignored if we counted Feb 9th and Feb 16th as the top is this: Wave 4 & 5 should take approximately the same amount of time as wave 1-3. We can see that wave 1-3 took about a month to complete. Between Feb 2nd when TSLA reached 197 and Feb 9th/16th there isn't enough time to satisfy this requirement but I thought what the heck. If 214 and 217 wasn't the top, then what is? Maybe *sugar* just got crazy as we rallied 110% you know?
I was wrong. The top actually was on Feb 28th at 212. In EWT this is called an ending diagonal where wave 5 would take on the form of a 5 overlapping waves. MOST OF THE TIME, it should make higher highs all the way up to the top. But there can be exceptions. In this case, since wave 3 ran up so high so quickly, there just isn't enough room for wave 5 to keep making higher highs so just a day before Investor's Day, it ran as high as it could before giving out at 212. See the red wedge shape? That's an ending diagonal's signature. That whole thing is just the stock burning time, for shares to change hand from the early dip buyers to Johnny Come Lately.
From there, everything else looks clean. We got a steep zig zag correction from 212 - 164 which only took 7 trading days. That left too much time on the table for the correction to look legit. So now we draw a time Fibonacci extension from Feb 28th and what do we get? The 62% extension, the conventional deadline for the correction, ended last Friday. What happened on Sunday? P&D report. So instead of carving out a bottom last week, the stock hit 164 on March 13th after an ok Investor's Day presentation. Honestly, anyone felt FOMO leading up to it? Anyone bought calls hoping for Elon to pump it hard? Nope. That's why the $50 drop in 7 days was fishy as heck, but they gotta do it. They gotta drop it hard and fast in order to pump it back up for P&D. So, instead of carving out a bottom, a dead cat bounce top was created instead. There isn't much time left for the 2nd leg down. The 100% time fib extension ends just before ER on 4/19th. They gonna drop it just as hard as they did last month around this time. In fact, they're doing it right now as we speak. 422k wasn't a bad number by any mean, just like how Investor's Day wasn't a disaster.