pr0teu5
Member
This is what boggles my mind a bit. OEMs are giant corporations and corporations' primary motivation is profit, so why are they sinking so much money, time, and resources into devoloping non-competitive products (basically the bare minimum to not be laughed out of the room) that will only sell in small numbers and lose money on each unit? Why wouldn't they try to make a product far ahead of the competition and own the segment for a few years (a la Toyota with hybrids)? Especially those companies who always brag about how innovative and forward-thinking they are. They need a disclaimer in their ads which states "but only if we don't really need to do any work". Of course, there is a scale of effort between brands...
I don't think it's really about the work that's required, it's more about the risk. Why would a a CEO risk his reputation and his job by sinking a large amount of money on a ground up electric vehicle project, when the fruits of that project are necessarily long term and his is evaluated on short term results. So they do minimal risk projects that stand as fig leafs for compliance and eco conscious consumers and will probably only ramp up production when they are forced too either my market pressures or regulation.
Tesla on the other hand has been purely electric from the get go so there's really no room for messing around. They have to invest all they have in making better electric cars at higher and higher volumes or else they die. It just so happens that such large investments give them a really large advantage over the big companies in the short/medium term.