Walta
Member
If the current software release is Tesla's answer to protect the battery? I would like to know how does Tesla recommend I drive the car to enjoy the $10K performance, but not break the battery?
If I never use LM, and only pedal mash - can I just PM all day long? As stated earlier - we don't have a red line indicator to avoid?
If I use LM - how many times can I use it?
Earlier someone brought this calculation up. So as it stands right now - to enjoy the $10K performance I must use LM. And we already know that too much LM will damage the battery.
Also I would be very interested in knowing what the performance of my car is with this reduction?
Lets say 465kw gets me at best an eleven second car? Which based on all the prior attempts to break into the 10's would be correct, since no one did it until the V3 battery with around 510kw. Since LM is going to damage the battery eventually ( and I never wanted the car catapulting on its own anyhow ).. I am not going to use LM. So I now have an 11 second car. Tesla will argue that if I use LM it is a 10 second car. I can see this dance going on for many years... with no good outcome.
So how much am I paying per LM ?
If Tesla can state that I can drive as hard as I want, all I want, when maxing out at 465kw? And that if I want full performance I can use LM for say up to ( 100 times a year for 8 years ) and not damage the battery? That would be roughly $10K / 800 or around $12 a launch. So it would be really good to know how many launches I can do, from both a cost perspective and to avoid damage?
Can you imagine just how unlikely a choice for ludicrous mode would have been when ordering the P90DL - if all this information was provided up front????
Transparency... is an ongoing issue with Tesla and the P90DL.
If I never use LM, and only pedal mash - can I just PM all day long? As stated earlier - we don't have a red line indicator to avoid?
If I use LM - how many times can I use it?
Earlier someone brought this calculation up. So as it stands right now - to enjoy the $10K performance I must use LM. And we already know that too much LM will damage the battery.
Also I would be very interested in knowing what the performance of my car is with this reduction?
Lets say 465kw gets me at best an eleven second car? Which based on all the prior attempts to break into the 10's would be correct, since no one did it until the V3 battery with around 510kw. Since LM is going to damage the battery eventually ( and I never wanted the car catapulting on its own anyhow ).. I am not going to use LM. So I now have an 11 second car. Tesla will argue that if I use LM it is a 10 second car. I can see this dance going on for many years... with no good outcome.
So how much am I paying per LM ?
If Tesla can state that I can drive as hard as I want, all I want, when maxing out at 465kw? And that if I want full performance I can use LM for say up to ( 100 times a year for 8 years ) and not damage the battery? That would be roughly $10K / 800 or around $12 a launch. So it would be really good to know how many launches I can do, from both a cost perspective and to avoid damage?
Can you imagine just how unlikely a choice for ludicrous mode would have been when ordering the P90DL - if all this information was provided up front????
Transparency... is an ongoing issue with Tesla and the P90DL.