An AWD platform can also offer improved handling and turning radius by applying different amounts of power to each wheel. See Audi's Quattro and Acura's SH-AWD as examples, or even the comments about turning radius on the Model X.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet the 85kWh Perf is much quicker than the 85kWh base, which to me indicates that battery is not necessarily the limiting factor.
... When I rode in the Model X Proto, it could turn much tighter than the Model S in the same spot of the road. This through the "magic" of all-wheel steering (torque steer), despite it's longer wheel base.
Tesla simply says "With a rigid body structure, nearly 50/50 weight distribution and a remarkably low center of gravity, ..."
Model S Features | Tesla Motors
Thanks so much for the quick reply!
This just confirms that the Model S snow traction will be not as good as an FWD car and not quite as bad as most RWD cars, but not nearly as good as an AWD car. The reason we decided to forego reserving a Signature Model S three years ago was based on the eventual availability of AWD in the future. Alas, this now seems like a pipe dream and I am pretty nervous about relying on a 50/50 weight distribution RWD car to provide the same level of winter mobility as the Audi S4 it will notionally replace.
Color me disappointed.
I used to live in Ohio and Iowa and got through the winters fine in a FWD car with all season tires. ...
....I'm sure AWD will be a little better in some circumstances but for the other 10 months in Cincinnati, the Model S would be a better choice.
I'm not convinced that AWD is a good thing for track performance, as it has some of the disadvantages of FWD. I've actually driven an AWD car on the track, and it tended to understeer when trying to accelerate out of the corners. I'm much faster in a more conventional, better balanced, and lighter weight RWD car.
I'm not surprised that an FWD car would do well enough around here in the winter. But, I used to own a BMW 750 a dozen years ago, or so. It had about 50/50 weight distribution and I had outfitted it with the most advanced winter tires of the day. It wouldn't go up my driveway reliably with the combination of snow and ice that is so common here. One time I got stuck off the driveway in my front yard and needed a 4WD tow truck to extract me.
Lately we haven't had that sort of winter, but they can come back unannounced.
BTW, how do you find the performance of your Roadster's A/C in Texas? Our R1.5 isn't so pleasant in August hereabouts.
The Roadster has a 60/40 weight distribution. Good for a sports car. (goes to 50/50 on braking/turning) Remember that battery is inches from your back. Only the PEM is over the wheels. A forward driver (and passenger) weighs much more.... Our Roadster 1.5 (#325) did reasonably well with snow traction because the battery pack mass was positioned toward the driven wheels....
I read somewhere (I can't find it now though) that Model S is 55/45 weight ratio. Pretty neat for a sedan w/ RWD
which means .... besides being pretty awesome for most aspects of driving IMO
It should Drift!
The Roadster has a 60/40 weight distribution. Good for a sports car. (goes to 50/50 on braking/turning) Remember that battery is inches from your back. Only the PEM is over the wheels. A forward driver (and passenger) weighs much more.
Agreed, but what if the front wheels didn't provide torque through the turn and only ramped up the torque as the car straightened out? I would assume the benefit would be the feel of a RWD car into the turn, but with the pull of a 4WD car out of the turn.
I had almost forgotten that Tesla hinted at an AWD version Model S three years ago. Hopefully they follow through, though now it doesn't seem likely till after the Model X launches.The reason we decided to forego reserving a Signature Model S three years ago was based on the eventual availability of AWD in the future. Alas, this now seems like a pipe dream and I am pretty nervous about relying on a 50/50 weight distribution RWD car to provide the same level of winter mobility as the Audi S4 it will notionally replace.
I'm used to seeing weight distribution expressed as F/R. Using this convention, did you mean 40/60?
Also, the battery pack weighs 900-1000 pounds. I don't. What did you mean by the driver weighing much more?