Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
  • Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
  • Tesla's Supercharger Team was recently laid off. We discuss what this means for the company on today's TMC Podcast streaming live at 1PM PDT. You can watch on X or on YouTube where you can participate in the live chat.

HW3.0 upgrade for basic AP owners now free?

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I see so you think that would exclude the MM computer from 'needing' updating?
I don't know what you are referring to as the MM computer...

But no, Tesla is not going to replace the Intel Infotainment computer with the AMD one on older vehicles, if that is what you were asking. There will just be different UIs on them at least for now. (Some people think that Tesla will bring the new UI to the Intel based vehicles in a later update.)
 
I don't know what you are referring to as the MM computer...

Multi Media, sorry I've seen others refer to it in that way
But no, Tesla is not going to replace the Intel Infotainment computer with the AMD one on older vehicles, if that is what you were asking. There will just be different UIs on them at least for now. (Some people think that Tesla will bring the new UI to the Intel based vehicles in a later update.)
okie smokie
 
Even though they promised that the car had all the hardware needed or FSD when it was sold...
As a long-term investor, I really hope this has teeth.

 
  • Like
Reactions: afadeev and Msjulie
Even though they promised that the car had all the hardware needed or FSD when it was sold...

yes- that's why it's free if you own FSD.

As a long-term investor, I really hope this has teeth.


It doesn't. It's a bump of an old story.


That's basically the same story from 2022.


Also from reports:
"The probe, which is not evidence of wrongdoing, could result in criminal charges, civil sanctions, or no action. Prosecutors are far from deciding how to proceed"
and
"Prosecutors scrutinizing Tesla’s autonomous-car claims are proceeding with caution, recognizing the legal hurdles they face, the people familiar with the inquiry said.
They will need to demonstrate that Tesla’s claims crossed a line from legal salesmanship to material and knowingly false statements that unlawfully harmed consumers or investors, three legal experts uninvolved in the probe told Reuters.
U.S. courts previously have ruled that “puffery” or “corporate optimism” regarding product claims do not amount to fraud. In 2008, a federal appeals court ruled that statements of corporate optimism alone do not demonstrate that a company official intentionally misled investors."
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: afadeev
This seems pretty evident to anyone that has been following FSD over the last 7 years or so.


Can you cite the statements you think that would be easy to make a case around?

Because per the reports, the DOJ themselves is still having trouble finding them after several years of investigation and tons of internal Tesla documents being reviewed.