I'm gonna wait for 2.5 before deciding if Tesla has a handle on this. "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is a pattern."Probably the more important update to FSD to date.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm gonna wait for 2.5 before deciding if Tesla has a handle on this. "Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three times is a pattern."Probably the more important update to FSD to date.
Say what????? Supervised is just an added word to help placate the systems acceptance and promote paying attention to the newbies. There is absolutely NO such thing as an UNsupervised L2 system.Version 13 will probably be unsupervised and will be a 3rd option that costs more
While FSD supervised replaces enhanced autopilot
That is what he is saying. "Supervised FSD" is a Level 2 system, and always will be. The prediction is that they will add a Level 4 Robotaxi/"Unsupervised FSD" option in the future, and that it will cost more. (Though original FSD buyers did essentially buy that.)There IS absolutely NO such thing as an UNsupervised L2 system.
And I predict I will win the lotto. Are cars are great and developing an excellent L2 (and I'm happy) but L4 is not likely in the realm of possibility with the hardware limitations. I bet on 8/8 (if Tesla covers it) we will find the Robotaxi will have HW5, MORE camera coverage (4 cross traffic and front bumper at least) at higher resolution/bit depth. Also wouldn't be surprised if they also include LiDAR and/or HD Radar. Serious Robotaxies require serious hardware....... The prediction is that they will add a Level 4 Robotaxi/"Unsupervised FSD" option in the future, and that it will cost more. (Though original FSD buyers did essentially buy that.)
Yea this means people that paid 15k for FSD will essentially be downgraded lolThat is what he is saying. "Supervised FSD" is a Level 2 system, and always will be. The prediction is that they will add a Level 4 Robotaxi/"Unsupervised FSD" option in the future, and that it will cost more. (Though original FSD buyers did essentially buy that.)
It can be looked at 2 ways.Yea this means people that paid 15k for FSD will essentially be downgraded lol
What improvements are you looking forward to? Mine behaves fine on the freeway.I hope they bring the AI stack to the freeways as well. I can't wait to see how it will behave on the freeway
One improvement is the switching of stacks can be awkward and case hiccups. Also this would free up a lot of space eliminating V11 code. We could maybe get some more fart sounds.What improvements are you looking forward to? Mine behaves fine on the freeway.
I'm not afraid of what others think.I gave up on Autopark yesterday. It took so long and had so many back-and-forth corrections that I wanted to get out and announce to any onlookers that I wasn't driving.
And I predict I will win the lotto. Are cars are great and developing an excellent L2 (and I'm happy) but L4 is not likely in the realm of possibility with the hardware limitations. I bet on 8/8 (if Tesla covers it) we will find the Robotaxi will have HW5, MORE camera coverage (4 cross traffic and front bumper at least) at higher resolution/bit depth. Also wouldn't be surprised if they also include LiDAR and/or HD Radar. Serious Robotaxies require serious hardware.
Finally retraining for comfort, braking, and throttle is music to my ears and frankly the family's vestibular system. And why not have a supervisory control/profile for it? Common sense says one size is tough to fit all.
1) Too late to signal ahead of turns, lane changes.
2) Too many unnecessary lane changes, even with the Minimal Lane Change setting taken for the trip. Sometimes I just want to stay in the lane moving at speed limit and flow with the traffic. FSD just wants to make lane changes unrelated to route following etc. When it signals I signal the other way and often the car has started moving in the direction FSD wanted to change to and then it swerves back to my lane which creates passenger discomfort as well as confusion for the cars behind.
3) not a freeway issue
4) not a freeway issue
5) Creeps too close to the car ahead on freeway sometimes. EAP/Autopilot has the 1 to 7 setting on how close we like to follow car ahead. FSD settings are on most conservative/Chill side and it gets closer than what EAP would do on proximity setting = 7.
What improvements are you looking forward to? Mine behaves fine on the freeway.
I have not had a single incident of disengagement on highways yet after 11.3.9, and FSDs. The disengagement on city roads have been due to ambiguous construction zone cone placements.What improvements are you looking forward to? Mine behaves fine on the freeway.
On my wife's newer 2023 Model 3 without USS, the autopark worked fine, actually usable. On my 2018 Model 3 with USS, the autopark has been absolutely terrible like you said.I gave up on Autopark yesterday. It took so long and had so many back-and-forth corrections that I wanted to get out and announce to any onlookers that I wasn't driving.
WTF does fixed even mean? The nags are back in 12.4? Or much reduced or gone in 12.4?
Back to make the guys at NHTSA have an oWTF does fixed even mean? The nags are back in 12.4? Or much reduced or gone in 12.4?