You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, you may be right.
My mistake
Would the 40kwh have been a more justifiable option for some of you? vs. no MS?
For me and anyone else on a budget, the 40kWh would have sold as hot cakes as it came out.
For me and anyone else on a budget, the 40kWh would have sold as hot cakes as it came out. As long as the range fits your daily needs. With the 60kWh battery software limited to 73% SoC and upgrade option to 60kWh plus super charging, that really would've been be a future proof entry drug.
Would the 40kwh have been a more justifiable option for some of you? vs. no MS?
I was originally looking at the 40kwh. I've owned 3 cars since 1990:
1979 Trans Am (used) ~$5000
1991 Dodge Stealth (lightly used) $$18000
2004 Mazda RX8 (new) $32000
You're not going to get an honest assessment here. Anyone who posts to this discussion group is a fanboy (or fangirl) - if they weren't, they would spend time elsewhere on the internet. Statisticians call this "selection bias".
You can't justify a Model S on cost alone. Even with an aggressive increase in the price of gasoline, there are other luxury cars that have a far lower total cost of ownership.
If a Model S fits your budget, you will likely be very happy with the purchase. If not, then either adjust your budget or get something else, like a used Model S.