richardnau
Member
I don't know why i'm doing this but, taking a look at ADR, in particular Vehicle Standard (Australian Design Rule 34/03 – Child Restraint Anchorages and Child Restraint Anchor Fittings) 2017. I guess this is the latest version, I've never used the site before, and it's late, I should be watching the latest Dave Chappelle Netflix special instead.
Does 6.1.1.1 refer to the Second Row Seats having 3 belts but, they split right down the middle, therefore middle seat anchorage is not required? e.g. like a 50/50 split , not 60/40 split?
Does 6.1.1.2 suggest the middle anchorage point is not neccessary as long as there are ones present for the other seating positions?
It's too late for this *sugar*.
View attachment 1009711
6.1.1.1 is the clause in this case. Basically, it's saying that if the back seat splits 50/50, you don't need to provide the upper tether point.
6.1.1.2 refers to vehicles with three rows of seats. If the folding seat is how you get at the seats in the rear, it doesn't need a tether.
I smoked into the ADR in some detail a few weeks ago in this forum. If you are suffering from insomnia, search back through my posts and enjoy.