Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

2024 Model 3 (Highland)- Spoiler improves or reduces range?

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Does anyone know if adding a spoiler to my model 3 will reduce my range? I really like the look of a carbon fiber lip but range is important for me. My round trip commute everyday is 124 miles so every mile counts 😅

Thanks in advance, hope someone’s already done this with their highland model 3!
 
Sure, adding a flat inch to the trunk lid will increase efficiency, and adding 2" would increase it more, 3" even more.
Where does it end?
This is one time that size doesn’t count.

IMG_2627.jpeg


IMG_2625.jpeg


Of course, sometimes a spoiler has its uses.

IMG_2626.jpeg
 
  • Funny
Reactions: UncleCreepy
Upvote 0
I don't know if it fits the highland, but supposedly the koenigsegg spoiler reduces drag


Up to $3500 for a spoiler? Holy moly. Someone needs to replicate this or 3D print it at least. $3500 is Ludacris, literally, for a stupid spoiler. Yikes.

Curious what their sales are. Zero maybe.
 
Upvote 0
  • Like
Reactions: canasion35
Upvote 0
I have the UP front lip on my 2022 Model 3 Performance. I originally bought it because I didn’t want to get rock chips on that part of the bumper.

I didn’t do any controlled testing before I put the front lip on so I can’t really say if it helps at all. However, I can definitely say it doesn’t hurt efficiency.

I have been able to maintain 225 wh/mi or less lately. Most of the gains are due to the ultra efficient 235/45/18 Hankook iON EVO AS tires but my efficiency has always been better than when it was 100% stock.

The front lip is probably not worth the price for efficiency alone but if you think it looks good and you want to protect that part of the bumper then I think it is worth it.

I didn’t even paint mine. I just left it unfinished and buffed it down to make it look a little smoother.

IMG_4710.jpeg


IMG_2551.jpeg
IMG_2545.jpeg
IMG_2554.jpeg
 
Upvote 0
on the early Model S (2012/13), the same debate ended with multiple owners experiencing lower range with the spoiler. Good for looks and downward forces, but as noted earlier, if it increased range, Tesla would have put it there for base models
 
Upvote 0
You do have a point. For all we know the wind tunnel tests could all be a simulation for marketing; however, there are members who say that it helps so I guess there's some substance to the claims..

As for Tesla, they can't even add in a simple blind spot indicator, so it'd be hard to give them the benefit of the doubt to do anything beyond bare minimum. As we know for them it's all about cost cutting. Perhaps the current spec of the spoilers on the Performance models are the bare minimum length, before crossing over into the no gain territory?

I would like to see a test of someone 3D printing a spoiler to extend further out from the UP one and to see how much that helps. In theory, the more tear drop shape the car is, the better the drag co-efficiency should be.

This is why the IONIQ 6 is designed the way that it is with the aggressive rear slope and duck bill spoilers making it one of the lowest drag co-efficiency EVs. 0.20 iirc.

Very curious now. Anyone have a 3D printer? I'll bring the drinks.
3D printing are devices like spoilers wouldn't be the best of ideas without heavy post processing to remove the layer lines. Printing it vertically on a delta style may let you get away without but I'm unsure how that would effect th
 
Upvote 0