You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regarding the motor's 5000RPM-at-75mph thing, he did mention that it was at the "current gear ratio" with, which his tone, suggests that it's not been finalized.
FYI forum members trying to download file: I tried also to download and got the same "invalid url". I have an imac with tiger OSX and the torrent software I use does not have the capability to edit the torrent address. Long and short had to use the Windows side of the imac. The windows version of the torrent software allowed me to change the "udp" to "http" and I was able to download the mp3 file after that.
I found it fascinating to listen to the engineer talking about twice as fast as I would find comfortable speaking; really reinforced the point he made about Tesla doing everything at a really quick pace.
The best way to think about the Roadster torque curve is that it has three parts: the flat region, which is limited by the motor; the linearly declining region, which is limited by the input power (the ESS), and then the superlinearly declining region which I think is also related to motor performance at very high RPM. Because the linear region is related to the battery, nothing you can do later in the powertrain will make it better, though you can make it worse. So, if you were to increase the gearing the in the Roadster, you would be in the flat region longer, but only because you're delivering lower overall torque, so it hits the power limit later. That is, it would be a strict loser in terms of 0-60 time.
The way to think of the gearing tradeoff is that lower gearing means greater low-end torque, faster 0-60 times, an earlier start to the linear region and lower top speed. Higher gearing is the opposite. Since top speed probably isn't that big of a concern in the Model S, I wonder why (if) they really went to higher gearing.