Gerardf
Active Member
I think the bears are trying to push us below the 200 DMA.
Lets see if they can keep us below that ... I doubt it..
Lets see if they can keep us below that ... I doubt it..
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
bdy0627
Active Member
Yes. I think it's a mistake for shorts to try to amplify an immediate dip as it may blow up in their face as the day progresses. I'm guessing with volume today, manipulation is pretty difficult though. In my mind, a more effective dip would have been after an initial rise at open. We'll see.
Mike Smith
Active Member
I think there was a lot of concern SpaceX had failed and Elon would be distracted trying to fix the problem. SpaceX has now said their launch was a success so we should rebound as media reports it (assuming they actually do).
Sorry guys, I tried to hold it up by buying 100 shares at 300.20. Did not work as planned. 
Gerardf
Active Member
Sorry guys, I tried to hold it up by buying 100 shares at 300.20. Did not work as planned.
Good deal... Who is selling those..?
I am ready to buy a TON at that US$ 300,20 price ;-)
LOL damn it!!!!! Always screw up on the SP......my bad...330.20 I meant
I don't count too much on medias reporting the launch went good...
Reporting that it failed attract way more viewer to their article.
Krugerrand
Meow
This is along the lines of making moist cake; you pull it from the oven and immediately stick it in the freezer for about 45 minutes. Makes the moister cake you’ve ever tasted.
Mike Smith
Active Member
CNBC finally reporting SpaceX not at fault. Should give TSLA a boost.
SpaceX rocket 'did everything correctly' in botched spy satellite launch
SpaceX rocket 'did everything correctly' in botched spy satellite launch
I've posted this in the Technical Analysis thread, but it may bear repeating here. The quote is from yesterday morning, but what follows it was made moments ago.
It appears as though short selling hedge funds this morning tried to depress the TSLA price under the current 200-day SMA of $332.40. Recent buying interest has now pushed the price back above that level. Again if the price remains above at the close, that should bode well.
It appears as though short selling hedge funds this morning tried to depress the TSLA price under the current 200-day SMA of $332.40. Recent buying interest has now pushed the price back above that level. Again if the price remains above at the close, that should bode well.
Last edited:
Gerardf
Active Member
Tomorrow @ 4PM ET we should see how many shares were held short on Dec 29th when SP was at US$ 310.
- http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla/short-interest
I think it will be higher than last report, with the negative press those weeks. . (as usual they short low, cover high).
Will be fun to calculate how much they lost the past 2 weeks, and maybe we get an update from Igor as well
- http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla/short-interest
I think it will be higher than last report, with the negative press those weeks. . (as usual they short low, cover high).
Will be fun to calculate how much they lost the past 2 weeks, and maybe we get an update from Igor as well
"We do not comment on missions of this nature, but here's a comment."
FWIW IB had 1.2 million shares available on 1/4 before market. They only had 250k available the next morning and only 80k this morning. They were around 1.3 million available for most of December.Tomorrow @ 4PM ET we should see how many shares were held short on Dec 29th when SP was at US$ 310.
- http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla/short-interest
I think it will be higher than last report, with the negative press those weeks. . (as usual they short low, cover high).
Will be fun to calculate how much they lost the past 2 weeks, and maybe we get an update from Igor as well
Usually when I'm bullish the next direction of the stock is down, but I'd hate to be short right now.
bdy0627
Active Member
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
