I outlined my hypothesis yesterday:
"Guys, TSLA float is 141.9 million shares, and today 46.3 million shares were traded,
which is 32.6% of the float.
This is truly remarkable: I believe what is going on is that 3 forces are reducing the float:
- "Don't sell below $5,000" long term holders - they are effectively insiders who don't sell,
- S&P 500 indexing accumulators who'll need these shares in a few months and who won't sell them,
- Shorts covering - where short positions covered destroy a matching number of long shares.
32.6% of the float trading in a
single day might be a signal of too few shares available in the float already ...
If true then the squeeze might become more VW-ish."
I forgot to list a fourth, fifth and sixth factor:
- Options writers and market makers delta-hedging. There's an incredible amount of open interest on the call side, well over 50 million shares equivalent ...
- Some really bug funds with a short TSLA position or naked call options might be close to blowing out (is Jim Chanos's fund fine - did they never write naked call options?) - and Wall Street might be smelling the bl**d in the water. Why sell to them before it's clear who exactly those getting squeezed are? This would further reduce the float ...
- Retail investors who bought the dip last year between May and October are still a couple of months away to be able to lock in long term capital gains tax rates. Selling right now would mean giving up 37% of the investment position (!), so steep was the rise, and so high the gains which moved many retail investors into the highest U.S. tax bracket. This takes out from the float those investors who'd otherwise consider divesting a bit, to dip-buy at least 37% lower. But to sell now they'd have to be convinced that the dip will be significantly deeper than 40% ... which is a tall order right now.
If true then the "effective float" of TSLA might have become too small, and the buying comes from distressed shorts and S&P 500 exposed investment funds fighting over too few fish in the pond.
Also, both shorts covering and S&P 500 exposed funds buying their ~0.4% allocation will further decrease the float, which presses up the price as new buyers have to convince existing shareholders with higher and higher price targets to part with their shares...
So it's a vicious circle, a self-reinforcing cycle, and the narrowing of the float created the VW squeeze as well. (Although under very different circumstances.)
I have no idea whether my hypothesis is true, but the percentage of the official float traded, which must in reality be
significantly smaller, is truly remarkable.