Mickey should keep his little hand to himself. Especially on a family-friendly forum.... that is when Mickey's little hand is lust after the 4 and his big hand is on the 8
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mickey should keep his little hand to himself. Especially on a family-friendly forum.... that is when Mickey's little hand is lust after the 4 and his big hand is on the 8
Not sure if they did because landing burn looked like all 3 engines fired back up.Looks like it lost an engine on the way down according to Everyday Astronaut
But I don't understand the selling pressure. Why would people be dumping the shares en masse when there's supposed to be a big pop? Unless there's some options stuff I don't understand going on, it seems like the numbers for what needs to be accumulated are very, very wrong.
NahSpace-X Starship SN8, It's not a crash just a quick disassembly
post split a $66 dollar swing
How will Tesla report the Chinese made cars shipped to Europe?
That came in a bit...hot...!
Pretty awesome though, so close!! Everything perfect except one engine failure at the end there. (maybe legs didn't deploy either?)
Watch it in super slow mo, looks like only one, and that one was firing with a weird green flame.Not sure if they did because landing burn looked like all 3 engines fired back up.
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, …”
Poetry.
A lot of traders use this heuristic:If you didn't give a hoot about Tesla and just traded professionally, why in the hell wouldn't you sell at $630 having bought 5 minutes ago(relatively speaking) at $430?
That sounds about right! The landing issue should be easy* to take care of; the small header tank didn't have enough fuel in it, leading to the engines being very low on fuel. As there is at the same time lots of very hot, very pure oxygen under very high pressure in the engine, and no fuel to disperse it a bit, the engine starts to become very melty. There are very few things as destructive as pure hot oxygen under pressure.For a first test flight, I make this as better than any reasonable and most unreasonable expectations.
1) Didn't blow up on the launch pad. check.
2) Controlled ascent (didn't go wandering off somewhere). check.
3) Even turned off some engines, intentionally, along the way; still controlled ascent. check. (NOTE: Watching the engines gymbal wildly at the shutoff to find the new balance point, and then continue on with a new center of thrust - wow)
4) Rolled over and fell in a controlled fashion to the right location (didn't aim for somebody's house; always a plus). check
-- probably should have already blown up by now
5) Got turned back around for landing (maybe going too fast at this point?). check
6) Finally missed sticking the landing by really only a little bit (based on SpaceX's previous history with landing Falcon 9). argh!
Solving the stick-the-landing problem might be more than trivial (such as some degree of Raptor engine redesign), but otherwise this is at least as good as the early Falcon 9 attempts to land.
Coming in too hot was an early problem. Landing and then sliding off (oops). And we know that they know how to solve those problems - they're doing it so routinely now that the launch threads aren't even getting to a second page any more.
Hi Audie, his shares of 510 and 570 are post split. Hie pre-split amounts of 102 and 114 are odd numbers but likely because he's buy a few at a time as he could afford them. He started in early 2013. His cost for all his shares was $59k.Is Phil so absent-minded he might also not be taking into account the 5:1? It's just possible he's.....[wait...gotta do some math here....]...five times happier than he thinks.
Writing this because otherwise the pre-split #s of 102 and 114 shares are - just a little bit - odd (who buys 102 instead of 100, for example?). So...just maybe....
I feel like we had this exact issue with early Falcon landing efforts. Should be easy enough to apply the same tweaks. #easyforspacexThat sounds about right! The landing issue should be easy* to take care of; the small header tank didn't have enough fuel in it, leading to the engines being very low on fuel.
Per Elon's twitter, the engines were fine and the header tank pressure was too low which starved them.Watch it in super slow mo, looks like only one, and that one was firing with a weird green flame.