You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The more competition the better for us consumers.
I don't read that article as saying that the upcoming 4-series EV will be "de facto" a front motor/rear drive design.I find it interesting that their de-facto approach to AWD is, a "frontmounted electric motor in combination with a fixed-ratio gearbox and so-called electric propeller shaft to channel drive to the rear wheels" , whereas their plan for an optional dual-motor setup is described as "The second, more complex and costly solution"
The TM3 looks like m EV, the BMw electric looks like a.........ICE car. It is interesting that the TM3 is considered the gold standard and it hasn't even hit the road yet! Must have something to do with the 400K+ reservations. The BMw is not going to be competition for the TM3 because price will be closer to a TMS than a TM3, no in-house battery factory, no proprietary SuperCharger system, very high Cd with that front end with all the meaningless swoops, scoops, and grilles, and their I3 is not setting the world on fire. BMw just doesn't get it, yet.
I don't see the problem. They'll increase production capacity. Core platform is shared while old is phased out.The only market this is competition for is their ICE infrastructure. They have a problem that no amount of squirming or press releases will solve. If they come out with a great EV (which I welcome), it could be disastrous for them, unless they are somehow able to accommodate all demand. Won't happen.
The only market this is competition for is their ICE infrastructure. They have a problem that no amount of squirming or press releases will solve. If they come out with a great EV (which I welcome), it could be disastrous for them, unless they are somehow able to accommodate all demand. Won't happen.
The future waits for no one. Lead, follow or get out of the way.
It's great that they're moving towards electrification, but this trope of every vehicle with some AER being competitive with Tesla needs to stop.
I don't read that article as saying that the upcoming 4-series EV will be "de facto" a front motor/rear drive design.
From that article: "BMW is weighing up two electric driveline options for its new Model 3 rival, with a decision expected by the end of this year prior to the construction of road-going prototypes early next year. The first uses a frontmounted electric motor in combination with a fixed-ratio gearbox and so-called electric propeller shaft to channel drive to the rear wheels. This layout would provide the new model with traditional BMW traits and, according to at least one source, the best possible weight distribution. The second, more complex and costly solution proposes the use of two electric motors, one mounted up front driving the front wheels and a second at the rear within the axle assembly to drive the rear wheels. Similar to the system that is set to appear on the electric-powered X3, it offers the choice between front and four-wheel drive, depending on the drive mode selected."
So according to that, BMW is simply evaluating those two approaches.
In contrast, Tesla has taken a more straightforward and to me logical design approach. RWD with the motor in the rear, with the many advantages that brings, or Dual Motor with the car's computer controlling how to employ those two motors.
What BMW will chose to do I have no idea. But whatever they finally end up selling, years from now, they will be years late to the EV revolution and likely playing a continual game of catchup. Tesla is not standing still and waiting for them to show up...
I find it interesting that their de-facto approach to AWD is, a "frontmounted electric motor in combination with a fixed-ratio gearbox and so-called electric propeller shaft to channel drive to the rear wheels" , whereas their plan for an optional dual-motor setup is described as "The second, more complex and costly solution"
Certainly the former solution is more familiar to BMW, but that seems to indicate to me that the issues of motor control and software design are larger challenges for BMW in comparison to the mechanical complexity (and disadvantages) presented by traditional mechanical AWD drivelines... including a tunnel with a shaft running down the center of the car and some sort of mechanical spilt coupling to manage torque distribution.
lol! They have to because they all quit last August to work for a Chinese EV startup!This is why the ICE manufacturers are in big trouble unless they abandon these old ways of thinking. They should probably hire a brand new engineering and leadership team for the EV side of the business that operate autonomously.
Of course, this is what they should have done a long time ago. My main point is that it is EV vs ICE, not BMW vs TSLA.I don't see the problem. They'll increase production capacity. Core platform is shared while old is phased out.
Uh yeah, but would they rather lose sales to another BMW or Tesla? Of course it competes with it's ice line of vehicles but they would rather those folks buy a BMW then a Tesla.