SucreTease
Teslarian
Fascinating work. But did you mean a 2170 pack?I think Tesla could easily make a 2160 pack for the S/X in the same form factor, but they're not going to do it
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fascinating work. But did you mean a 2170 pack?I think Tesla could easily make a 2160 pack for the S/X in the same form factor, but they're not going to do it
Fascinating work. But did you mean a 2170 pack?
I have access to a large undisclosed quantity of Nissan Leaf batteries if you are interested.....
Probably why someone wanted to dump 50 of them. Now they are just slowly degrading in a warehouse because they don't have built-in charge controllers.The Leaf batteries are probably the only commercial EV batteries I actually don't like, due to the lack of proper thermal management... most of the ones I've come across are heavily degraded, so I stopped even looking for or bothering with them. They can definitely have some life in something like a solar setup, but they're super hit or miss on quality. Definitely not a good choice for an EV, IMO.
Wait, wait, do you remember when EM said the Y would have FWD in a tweet? Those were suspiciously absent at the reveal.....What?? Ever heard of the LR3 RWD? It is less than $45K before Fed tax incentives with a range of 325 miles. So in just 8 years, Musk over delivered, with $5K less and 25 miles more range.
Half truths and lies do you say? Just like the dozens of announcements made by VW, Audi, BMW in the last 10 years. Why don't you do the research and report back here.
If you were trying to lie and troll, you will have better luck at Seeking Lies and TSLQ twitter feeds.
Thankfully. I'm not going to criticize Elon for learning not to make mistakes.Wait, wait, do you remember when EM said the Y would have FWD in a tweet? Those were suspiciously absent at the reveal.....
Wait, wait, do you remember when EM said the Y would have FWD in a tweet? Those were suspiciously absent at the reveal.....
Excellent work. We cannot start recycling batteries soon enough. If Tesla doesn't play nice offering replacing batteries at a competitive cost, they have this coming. And a car that can suffice on less batteries that it's got, is being wasteful.In the end, I'll be able to make fully aftermarket Tesla battery packs with various targets (range or power or both), and they'll be just bolt-in replacements that any shop can do (no need to fiddle with firmware, the pack handles all of that).
Well, one of my ongoing projects is being able to replace a Tesla battery pack with a non-Tesla battery pack.
Right now, I've been driving a Model S almost daily that has no Tesla battery pack (empty pack casing with a dummy coolant loop), that believes it has a Tesla battery pack, but instead is running off of one Chevy Volt battery secured in the trunk. I've completely reverse engineered the Tesla BMS, protocols, etc, and have the car convinced that it has a 15 kWh battery pack with ~50 miles of range... and it works pretty well so far. Onboard chargers work, and technically could make supercharging work if the pack were large enough. This is mostly a proof of concept.
In the end, I'll be able to make fully aftermarket Tesla battery packs with various targets (range or power or both), and they'll be just bolt-in replacements that any shop can do (no need to fiddle with firmware, the pack handles all of that).
Was trying to find a pic of a full charge, but don't have anything handy... and at the time this was taken, the BMS wasn't reporting energy usage to the counters that tally it for the UI yet, so 0 kWh used since last charge, lol.
I think Tesla could easily make a 2170 pack for the S/X in the same form factor, but they're not going to do it. I'll probably have to do it at some point... but first I need to make my 2100A discharge capable Model S battery.
Wait, don't larger cells have a worse guts to surface ratio causing them to be less apt for high load applications?
I also wonder where the hot water goes. Will it be used for showering by someone? In the climate cult people love to obsess about the breathe of life that is CO2, but blatantly ignore the actual heat generated at the very same moment. Where does the heat go? No-one wants to know or talk about that. Rare to find a paper taking the heat itself into account in any sort of way.
Excellent work. We cannot start recycling batteries soon enough. If Tesla doesn't play nice offering replacing batteries at a competitive cost, they have this coming. And a car that can suffice on less batteries that it's got, is being wasteful.
One Tesla pack's cells could power 3 cars pretty well. A Tesla wreck without battery can't be very expensive. If custom modules could be added modularly over time or to facilitate a particular road trip, that'd be a win.
The issue is the commute. Replacing the ICE vehicle with a (relatively) emissions free vehicle is a must. But root cause is the excessive distances traveled. Not only is the long commute an environmental issue, it is a time waster, something that is finite for all of us.We're seeing Model 3 taking a 3C charge, but not yet a 5.5C discharge. Are the cells as good at that as 18650s?
A 102.4kWh pack from 2170s, will that do as well with L loads? We've not seen it from Model 3 P as yet. Which doesn't mean these cells never will bring that, with smart fuses and the like.
And regarding affordable 300mi cars...
A 300mi battery for average motorist use is like getting yuor wife a hummer to go her daily groceries with so she doesn't have to take the bicycle anymore. Utterly wasteful and polluting. Batteries are not Elon's farts, they take a lot of processing and energy. It's not all green butterfly holograms.
I don't know if you were joking or not, but there have been much written about the heat island effect cities create from waste heat. Though the total amount of heat humans create is tiny compared to the amount of heat from the sun that is trapped in the atmosphere and a fair bot of heat radiates back into space on a clear night.
Also the heat generated by EVs is a minuscule percentage of heat generated by cars. The EVs with radiators have very tiny radiators compared to ICE and the coolant loops on cars take much more stress than an EV's cooling system. When you aren't driving hard or supercharging the radiators can even be shut down on an EV.
The only ICE that can go more than a few miles without fluid in the radiator have oversized oil circulation systems that act as a secondary radiator. Most ICE will crack the engine block without a couple of miles without radiator fluid.
Oh and the reason Tesla settled on the 2170 form factor is because it's the best trade off between energy density and efficient cooling. When battery cells get bigger it gets harder to keep the center within a good temperature range and smaller has too much wasted space.
At least in the US Tesla wrecks tend to be very expensive. I don't know his last name, but there is a guy with a YouTube channel called Rich's Rebuilds who started posting here on this forum when he bought a flooded Model S and put it back on the road. Due ot the success of his videos and stories about the rebuild, the prices for wrecked Teslas have gone off the peg.
Tesla has said they will recycle batteries when the time comes. Ultimately it will be cheaper than using raw materials. However there aren't enough worn out Tesla batteries yet to make it worthwhile to do it on anything but a very small scale. The EVs with the worst record for longevity are Leaf batteries because they are so poorly cooled.
Secondary use is exactly what has been happening with wrecked Tesla's. Other than that we don't have large volumes of used Tesla packs lying around to be recycled.My issue is that why haven't we seen secondary uses for batteries, rather than recycling? For example, if we have a use case scenario that need xx amount of kilowatts, we simply build a pack that meet that criteria with used batteries. The degradation will continue as normal, but perhaps we over-provision so that the effect is felt less or eliminated during the usage lifecycle.
We could.... If there were upgrades.....Secondary use is exactly what has been happening with wrecked Tesla's. Other than that we don't have large volumes of used Tesla packs lying around to be recycled.
My issue is that why haven't we seen secondary uses for batteries, rather than recycling? For example, if we have a use case scenario that need xx amount of kilowatts, we simply build a pack that meet that criteria with used batteries. The degradation will continue as normal, but perhaps we over-provision so that the effect is felt less or eliminated during the usage lifecycle.
Nissan and Renault have their battery recycling initiatives.
I commented on the heat ICEVs produce, not the most rabid climate warner will address that. It's all about the CO2. Which is plant food. Heat just IS. And blocked by the greenhouse, if I have to go by climate warners.
Yes, seriously. Those V3 cables are thin and flexible. They will create a significant heat loss. Where does the water go? It an external cooling system powered to cool it, or is the heat lost in a radiator? Hot water just pumped into the sewer? Or is it hot enough to extract energy from? In my opinion, it's worth trying to use that heat for applications where heat would have to be sourced otherwise. All about climate change, huh? We can hold Tesla to high standards. The world needs us to hold everyone to high standards. Neighbor, you never leave the city, why do you have a long range EV? That's wasteful, you should have kept the gas car an just chip tune it, maybe experiment with HHO on demand, see what you can do there.
I mentioned this trade-off in cell because wk057 thought the larger cells would cool better due to that larger surface area which according to my info is inverse of reality. Double the diameter of a cell, double the surface area, quadruple the content and thus heat...
If the atmosphere wasn't venting heat, life would be impossible as well.CO2 is plant food, but if Earth's atmosphere didn't trap heat we'd all be dead long before we had to worry about no food. Earth is a good place for life because of the atmosphere's ability to hold heat from the sun overnight (without holding too much). In places with no atmosphere like the Moon, it can be deadly hot in direct sunlight and deadly cold in shadows only inches away.
Physicist here: All of these rates are nonsensical. TW, PW, and W are already rates. To say a rate per hour or per day is meaningless (e.g. 60 mph per day is nonsensical).The amount of heat energy put into the atmosphere now by cars is about 12.7 TW (12 X 10^12) a day.... Solar radiation hitting the Earth is 174 PW (174 X 10^15) a day.... Human beings produce between 100 and 150W of heat an hour.