Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Navigate on Autopilot is Useless (2018.42.3)

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Been lurking since the original post. I reserved judgement until ive had to time to see for myself. Since this came out, i have done numerous short trips and about a 1/2 dozen long trips of about 5 hours where 2/3rd were highway and NOA worked.

Im going to have to agree with the OP. I have found no value with NOA. Ive also played with all 3 settings.

My list of grievances:
- Constant need to stay in the left lane.
-Doesnt like the right lane just because of ramp entrances.
- Horrible timing for suggesting a lane change to maintain speed
- Number of mishandling of exit ramps.

Its just not ready. Ive initiated lane changes much sooner and better to maintain my speed and not cause cars to slam on its brakes.
Its inability to understand even someone dense traffic.

If I was forced to have it because I wasnt allowed to control the car, it could "mostly" do ok on the highways, but not good enough yet.
Ive turned it off for now.
 
I have 46.2 and it's no better than 42.x was. It's so bad I can't help but wonder if the people who have posted that they love it and it works really well for them are just plain lying. If not, they're driving on extremely different roads than I am, or my car has a hardware problem of some sort. This is not a matter of opinion, it's not personal preference -- this feature is useless, aggravating, stressful and dangerous for me, in my car, on the roads I drive on (and I've tried it on a lot of roads, including very nice easy Interstates).
Hi; I like it and am not lying. The only serious problem I have had with it is somewhere where the maps are really wrong. Otherwise it's a pretty neat alpha product and I can see the path to a useful beta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scottf200
Are you sure about that? I think the torque that « locks » the wheel is pretty robust but it does not FULLY disable the input while in AP. To see this, while driving relatively fast (more precisely, not slowly), spins the wheel left right left right etc. In fast succession and you’ll feel the car « dancing » and being unstable WHILE on AP. So it definitively disable it well but not fully imo.

Oh, and the very notion of having to over steer to take control is super dangerous imo. You have to over steer, get back control of your oversteer (especially at highway speed) and THEN fix the possible initial situation

Power assisted steering based on the steering wheel is disabled when AP is in control. You still have a mechanical link to the steering rack, of course, but it's not super useful with the computer holding control. The EPAS can easily overpower a human, also.

Tesla has no steering column lock. So sit in the car with it off and try to turn the wheel. That's how much control you have when AP is engaged.
 
I just gave unmodified, unhacked, fully stock 2018.42.3 Navigate on Autopilot a good try with an open mind on a ~300 mile drive this weekend.

I've seen some videos, tweets, posts, etc praising the feature. I hadn't really had a chance to try it on a longer drive myself as of yet, though, until this weekend.

TLDR version: This is the most useless thing I've ever seen. I've seen some whoppers, but this takes the cake.

Let's do a rundown of what I think was improved:
  • Autosteer in highway interchanges and off-ramps was improved. It would stay in the ramp without too much trouble, while prior it would freak out and demand the driver intervene for sharper curves. (We'll ignore that it was taking the turns at ~15 MPH lower than the suggested speeds, but baby steps I suppose).
  • Visual indication of what travel lane was needed for upcoming interchanges was reasonable and a good addition to normal navigation.
  • I do like the path visualization when lane changes are initiated.
  • It does usually try to take exits without intervention (more on this later) which is a step in the right direction for on-ramp to off-ramp autopilot.

So, some improvements I suppose.

Now for the bad.
  • I now fully understand why Tesla makes it require confirmation. If it had been allowed to make the suggested lane changes on its own without confirmation, I'd likely have died 10-20x if I didn't take control every time.
  • AP1 and AP2 previously did *okay* when following a lane that ended and gradually merged into a single lane. While using NavOnAP this weekend, the car just wanted to make its own lane instead every time instead of merging... usually trying to run into a barrier or median, requiring intervention every time.
  • The car regularly suggested lane changes directly into objects it clearly detected. It would even show the proposed path on the visualization as going directly through the other vehicle. In one instance I wondered if it really was going to let me change lanes into a semi truck, or if it would wait until it was clear. Nope, it started to move right towards it after confirmation. No red lane, nothing, while directly along side a semi. *shakes head*
  • NavOnAP has no concept of "Keep Right, Pass Left". It never suggests lane changes back to the right in any of the available modes.
  • Further, it randomly suggests lane changes to the left for no reason whatsoever. No traffic, no interchanges, nothing.
  • I found the car randomly decelerating at least 10x during the trip with no obvious cause. More common when driving in the right lane vs left. It would also set a seemingly random max speed at times, with no speed limit changes or interchanges.
  • AP2 still doesn't read speed limit signs, so the noted speed limit doesn't always match the real highway speed limit in areas where it was recently upped or lowered (happens a lot around here with places bumping to 70).
  • At least once the car detected a construction zone with a popup about it (kudos on that) and then immediately proceeded to try and suggest a lane change into construction cones..... which negates this from making the "improvements" list above.
  • Overtake suggestions are useless. On two lanes, driving in the right lane, I would approach a vehicle ahead that was traveling more slowly. No other traffic. The car would decelerate... 5.... 10.... 15 MPH.... as it sees the vehicle. Then, after matching its speed at my set following distance, a few seconds later it'd popup "Confirm lane change" to overtake. Seriously, wtf. And not just once in a while. Every single time I waited for the suggested change, it behaved this way. In every mode setting, including "Mad Max".
    • The car detects the other vehicle way in advance, even when just using the in-car visualization for reference, and could easily make the suggested lane change early enough so that no deceleration at all would be needed, even with the delay of requiring confirmation.
  • On multiple occasions the car would start doing a lane change (either a confirmed one, a manually initiated one, or an automatic one for an exit), get part way through, and quickly veer back into the starting lane for no reason. About half of those times it would popup with "Lane change cancelled". In one instance I actually missed an exit because it was 2/3's into the exit ramp lane, stayed there a moment, then just jumped back to the left for no reason.... ugh.
  • Even features that were usable before, like manually initiated auto lane changes, are no longer reliable.

Overall, using "Navigate on Autopilot" did not improve the experience of using Autopilot at all, with the limited exception of autosteer's new ability to mostly keep in lane on a tight interchange... with that being negated by the fact that it tries to kill you any time a lane ends. Also, it seems that the ability to take tight interchanges is mostly thanks to nav fusion, as the vision model does not appear to be properly detecting lanes in some of these situations, yet the system presses onward.

The suggested lane changes were completely useless on every mode. It would either suggest changes that weren't necessary, weren't safe, or weren't useful. It was even suggesting lane changes for an interchange upwards of 8 miles away at one point, then refusing to suggest overtake lane changes until after that interchange.

Some more notes:
  • Vehicle detection to the sides and behind your vehicle is complete garbage.
    • This is super obvious when sitting still with other still vehicles all around. You'll seem them "swimming" around the visualization, colliding with each other, with you, etc.
    • Also obvious when overtaking large vehicles. Almost every single semi truck, bus, or RV I passed ended up with a twin ghost visual on the screen.
    • Finally, vehicles to the side are regularly shown overlapping my own vehicle visual, despite them being firmly in their own lane.
    • Vehicles behind your vehicle are actually detected only part of the time, apparently due to some issue with the rear cam setup in the hardware (@verygreen I believe has documented this).
  • It seems very obvious that Tesla has no real data fusion whatsoever between the cameras. This results in both huge gaps in the usable data as well duplicate data (like the ghost trucks). This is like computer vision 101 stuff that I don't understand why Tesla hasn't overcome this, especially in something shipped to thousands of customers.
  • Radar/vision fusion on AP2 appears to be significantly worse than AP1, with AP1 easily accurate for a few cm... AP2 easily worse than +/- 1m... very obvious when looking at the lead vehicle visualization.
  • Some of the failings of NavOnAP don't even make sense. If it clearly "sees" a vehicle, it seems like a basic sanity check in the higher level code would prevent it from suggesting a lane change into it.... but this isn't what happens.

Could probably go on for quite a while, but suffice it to say I won't be using the feature any further... not at least until it's actually useful.

It doesn't improve the experience of using autopilot for me one bit. In fact, it makes it even more frustrating. This is ignoring the super frequent nags that plague the more recent firmwares, too.

I'll be sticking to my AP1 vehicles for longer trips from now on I think. In fact, I'm probably going to try and make time to make some videos/posts about AP1/AP2 modifications that are actually useful.

For example, my modded AP1 vehicle would handle the situation I noted above (overtaking a vehicle) smoothly with zero deceleration. AP1 (and AP2) can detect a vehicle ahead of you over 100m away... no excuse for the behavior of NavOnAP.

I'm just super disappointed in Tesla. Their spat with Mobileye has cost Tesla customers a huge amount of progress on the autopilot front. AP1 owners are completely screwed because they will get zero improvements. (Despite promises of ongoing improvements, AP1 hasn't had a single improvement in about two years). Meanwhile, AP1 is running on Mobileye hardware that was released nearly 5 years ago and still handles many situations better than AP2. And it's not like Mobileye has stopped. They're positioned to blow Tesla out of the water with their current hardware (EyeQ4), and off the face of the Earth with their upcoming hardware (EyeQ5). Had Tesla not screwed us all over in that regard, it's likely AP1 would still be improving and that AP2 would be running the next gen of Mobileye hardware with features well beyond what Tesla is capable of doing today. Again, just disappointing that they've decided to forsake early adopters yet again, and also give current adopters less value for their $ in the meantime.

I'm sure people will come out in force to defend Tesla, say how great NavOnAP is, etc... and by all means, do what you must. I personally own both types of vehicles (AP1 and AP2) and drive both regularly... pretty simple to tell the deficiencies of AP2. You're not going to convince me that somehow my extensive first-hand experience is somehow flawed and that things are way better than I claim. lol.

I find it hard to believe that as a one-man free-time dev crew I've been able to do better than Tesla's entire multi-million-dollar-funded AP dev team has been able to do in more than two years. I have maybe 40 hours of total work into my AP1 mods, and they've been more usable than NavOnAP for nearly two years. I just don't get it. I'm pretty good at what I do, but I can't believe I'm better-than-full-teams-with-millions-in-funding good.

To that end, when/if I get the time, I'm going to set a goal for myself of ~25 hours of work to make a hardware/software modification to an AP2 vehicle that actually does what NavOnAP is supposed to do. Start to finish, from scratch. It's been suggested that I get some basics prepped (hardware I need in-hand, for example), then keep a GoPro on a chesty running until the modifications are done and working to document the entire thing.

If doable, then I think it would be even more obvious that we have to reevaluate Tesla's progress on the driver assistance front.

Anyway, enough of that for now.

Disclaimer: I have no positions with any of the companies mentioned nor do I intend to initiate one at any point in the future.

My findings mimick your results 100% , i am at a loss for the ones here that say it works “fine”
 
My findings mimick your results 100% , i am at a loss for the ones here that say it works “fine”
Don't compare it to FSD but just incremental improvement to AP that you still need to be responsible for and monitor. I do lane changes just like I would when driving manually ... meaning I check mirrors and have my hands on the wheel. If I found the lane to be clear and checked the mirrors during the lane change then I would even override AP if it wanted to cancel the lane change 1/2 way thru ... after all I monitored the lane change and didn't assume.

It met all my reasonable expectations in my 1500 mile trip to the Hickory NC area of Thanksgiving. It nicely took many highway exits and had good suggestions for being in the right lane. Prev post: Navigate on Autopilot is Useless (2018.42.3)

They are using all the millions of miles of NoA to collect data an improve it. If people don't like it just turn it off and the rest of us will collect that data for them/you so they can continue to make incremental improvements to NoA and eventually early beta FSD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EinSV
Don't compare it to FSD but just incremental improvement to AP that you still need to be responsible for and monitor. I do lane changes just like I would when driving manually ... meaning I check mirrors and have my hands on the wheel. If I found the lane to be clear and checked the mirrors during the lane change then I would even override AP if it wanted to cancel the lane change 1/2 way thru ... after all I monitored the lane change and didn't assume.

It met all my reasonable expectations in my 1500 mile trip to the Hickory NC area of Thanksgiving. It nicely took many highway exits and had good suggestions for being in the right lane. Prev post: Navigate on Autopilot is Useless (2018.42.3)

They are using all the millions of miles of NoA to collect data an improve it. If people don't like it just turn it off and the rest of us will collect that data for them/you so they can continue to make incremental improvements to NoA and eventually early beta FSD.


I honestly cannot see this working correctly without additional sensing hardware and increased ap math rates.

Decisions are slow , late , sloppy. Blind areas for detection are numerous, Skipping the tech talk its just eap at best.
 
They are using all the millions of miles of NoA to collect data an improve it. If people don't like it just turn it off and the rest of us will collect that data for them/you so they can continue to make incremental improvements to NoA and eventually early beta FSD.

Everyone collects data, even when it’s off, even when privacy is disabled, everyone is collecting and sending data to the mothership until you get yourself fully blacklisted that is. ;)
 
Hi; I like it and am not lying. The only serious problem I have had with it is somewhere where the maps are really wrong. Otherwise it's a pretty neat alpha product and I can see the path to a useful beta.

Don't compare it to FSD but just incremental improvement to AP that you still need to be responsible for and monitor. I do lane changes just like I would when driving manually ... meaning I check mirrors and have my hands on the wheel. If I found the lane to be clear and checked the mirrors during the lane change then I would even override AP if it wanted to cancel the lane change 1/2 way thru ... after all I monitored the lane change and didn't assume.

It met all my reasonable expectations in my 1500 mile trip to the Hickory NC area of Thanksgiving. It nicely took many highway exits and had good suggestions for being in the right lane. Prev post: Navigate on Autopilot is Useless (2018.42.3)

So are you guys saying that you aren't experiencing any of the issues that were identified in this thread, or do you see the issues but find them to pass your personal risk threshold?
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: rnortman
I have quite a bit of experience with AP and I *always* hold on with at least one hand and often two. I would have crashed many times as it has lost its way in odd situations / painted lines / strange sections of roads. I drive respectfully and fully aware that it is not ready for FSD and all corner cases.

I had ~~25K AP miles on my AP1 X 90D (~36K miles total)
I have ~10K AP miles on my AP2 X 100D (~26K miles total).

I honestly cannot see this working correctly without additional sensing hardware and increased ap math rates.
Decisions are slow , late , sloppy. Blind areas for detection are numerous, Skipping the tech talk its just eap at best.
They are on record that they will upgrade the 2.0 (or 2.5) hardware as necessary. I paid for FSD when I bought my second X.

Everyone collects data, even when it’s off, even when privacy is disabled, everyone is collecting and sending data to the mothership until you get yourself fully blacklisted that is. ;)
I believe there is even more data when errors happen and you have to take over. That is not 'shadowed' but actively using AP and triggering when a human had to take over. Hope that makes more sense as to what I was saying.

So are you guys saying that you aren't experiencing any of the issues that were identified in this thread, or do you see the issues but find them to pass your personal risk threshold?
It seems to me the main issue is lane changing. I described that above (Navigate on Autopilot is Useless (2018.42.3)). I haven't had any issues with off ramps. Suggestions for getting in the correct lane about 1.5 miles in advance of a off ramp or correct lane in a Y-split has worked well for me.

My findings were spot on with wk057, basically unusable , and id be dead as all fûck if i didnt intervene.
Haha, yes we all would have. Again, I would have crashed many times as it has lost its way in odd situations / painted lines / strange sections of roads. I drive respectfully and fully aware that it is not ready for FSD and all corner cases.
________________

4lOM5kN.jpg


After announcing an upcoming new Autopilot 3.0 hardware upgrade last week, Elon Musk now updates us on the timing and confirms who is going to get the upgrade for “free” – or more accurately, included with an existing Autopilot package.
During its second quarter conference call last week, Tesla claimed that it now has the ‘world’s most advanced computer for autonomous driving’ and that it will be released in an Autopilot 3.0 upgrade coming “next year”.

It consists of a new computer based on a chip developed in-house by Tesla especially to run a computer vision neural network, which Tesla has been using to power the latest generation of the Autopilot.

The company claims that this new chip increases the processing capacity by an order of magnitude and will enable Tesla to bring fully self-driving capability to its vehicles, which Tesla has been advertising as being compatible with its vehicles since October 2016 when they introduced the Autopilot 2.0. suite.
Via: Tesla’s new Autopilot hardware upgrade will be free for owners with the $3,000 to $5,000 ‘Full Self-Driving’ package
__
ALSO Green's and others examples show good coverage and recognition. I have no doubt my 2.0 hardware will need to be updated to handle all the images and interpretation of events/corner_cases.

D87Fhl2.jpg
 
After using the NoA whenever I can on various routes. I wouldn't say it's completely useless but it works best when there is sparse traffic.

The decision time is slow and even worse if the road is not leveled and sometimes make questionable choices of lane changes and speed. Driver must keep close eyes on it's decision and suggestion, there are still lots of limitation and surprises, hits and misses are common.

Currently the map data does not differentiate express lane and cameras doesn't know there is concrete barrier - while the map data is understandable but the combination of camera inability to detect barriers can be fatal - one day I was driving in the express lane contained by concrete barrier, the nav determined it's time to exit and tried to turn right - unfortunately :

1. It's not on the right most lane, actually it is the fourth lane from the right.
2. It should have slowed down earlier, not trying to exit at 75 mph
3. There are concrete barriers on both side and there is no opening at that spot, non express lane yes but not inside the express lane. If I let it exit then it will crash into the barrier at high speed !

I still have faith one day the system will handle more scenarios, but just be extremely cautious for now.
 
Power assisted steering based on the steering wheel is disabled when AP is in control. You still have a mechanical link to the steering rack, of course, but it's not super useful with the computer holding control.
Makes sense, thanks! I actually didn’t know (!) whether a mechanical link was still required or if it could be completely disconnected and go through the bus
 

This video has been posted here on TMC before, and I think it's relevant to discussion of NOA — or really any discussion of driver-assistance features. TL;DW: if automation ends up increasing the driver's workload in a given situation, then that's a situation where it's safer to turn it off and just drive manually.

I don't know if you have an aviation background or are just passing the video along, I don't think that your summary is accurate. The talk was actually about the inappropriate use of aircraft autopilot and other automated systems. An example for us would be using the cruise control stalk to decrease the car's speed to avoid a potential collision. This has nothing to do with workload management.
 
I don't know if you have an aviation background or are just passing the video along, I don't think that your summary is accurate. The talk was actually about the inappropriate use of aircraft autopilot and other automated systems. An example for us would be using the cruise control stalk to decrease the car's speed to avoid a potential collision. This has nothing to do with workload management.

No, I don't have an aviation background. I'm certainly cherry-picking ideas from that talk, and applying them to this thread's topic. Sorry if that seemed like an inaccurate summary. I wasn't really trying to summarize the talk for pilots: I was trying to summarize how it could apply to drivers and NoA.

The speaker first mentions workload at about 02:00, and goes on to explain that reducing the level of automation can reduce workload, improving safety. I'm not sure that he uses the exact phrase "workload management": is that a term of art? Apologies if I'm mangling any aviation terminology. Anyway when that speaker is talking about improving safety in certain situations by reducing automation, he says things like "this is not a good time to be typing" and "first, fly the plane". I think he mentions "task load", and that got me thinking about cognitive limits.

Cognitive load - Wikipedia

Task loading - Wikipedia

I'm not at expert on cognition either. I try to be aware of my own limits, for safety and productivity. When I see someone driving badly, my first guess is that they're trying to multi-task.

Applying "Children of Magenta" and cognitive limits to driving, I think a tricky situation isn't a good time to test or debug TACC, AutoSteer, or NoA. Turn it off and drive. Hopefully we're all such good drivers that that doesn't need saying. But right now NoA is the shiny new toy. Sometimes shiny makes us stupid. I know I want to play with it, to see what it can do — even though I don't trust it.