This recent post on Insideevs.com (sourced from Bloomberg) seemed worthwhile to share and briefly consider if the news changes anything as to how Euro ICE companies will get batteries they can't or don't want to produce themselves.
CATL To Build Battery Factory In Europe Like LG Chem & Samsung SDI
Focus is on CATL plans to build a GF in a Euro country to supply developing demand from these Euro auto companies. LG Chem and Samsung are said to be following suit, which isn't surprising.
Article says CATL is down to potential locations in three countries for their factory. It reports CATL's IPO is to raise 2 B to fund a really large Chinese factory that would when complete quintuple their current battery production.... and make them the world's biggest battery maker by 2020. Of course Bloomberg never remembers that by end of 2020, Tesla GF1 is planned to be producing 105 GWh, at least double what CATL is hoping to reach.
There have been a number of well reasoned and convincing postings to the effect that ICE companies introducing x, y or z new EV models by fill in the blank year, doesn't mean they will be able to meaningfully compete with Tesla in a few more years.
To simplify, they have neither the will or the battery supply to market and mass produce EVs anytime soon. The assertion that to the extent these companies ramp up EV production, they cannibalize sales of their far more profitable ICE vehicles seems logical and well reasoned. Will CATL, LG and Samsung at least provide BMW, Mercedes, VW etc. with the battery supplies they would need if they wished to sell meaningful volume of EVs?
I don't think it does, based on considering the time/effort it may take for them to bring such GFs on line. Consider CATL. This year will be half gone before they select where to build their Euro GF. CATL experience is in making LiPo cells, so executing a GF making different chemistry cells is going to take more time than duplicating their current factories at larger scale.
I'm skeptical that they could have such a plant operational before end of 2021. Just like Tesla GF1, when first going live, they will produce 5 or 10% of planned output the first year. Perhaps in 2021 it makes 5 GWh. Enough for < 100K cars. In 2022, maybe 3 or 4 times that. Enough for 3 - 400K long range EVs. But where will Tesla be by 2022?
That is discussed and debated often, so this is just a
conservative WAG for Tesla car annual numbers to compare.
2018 250K
2019 500K
2020 800K (we all hope for 1M, but staying conservative)
2021 1.2M
2022 2M
If Samsung and LG (plus any Euro company production - which slowly ramps up through 2030) are a half step behind CATL,
the combination of supply for the ICE companies might support at best half of Tesla's production by 2022. However even that can't happen unless they commit to increase their EV production fast enough to meet the potential supply CATL and the others could provide if capital funded to do so. If this estimating is even in the ball park, it suggests Tesla's growth will not be constrained at all by competitors. Not that back of the napkin math is likely to be attempted by Wall Street analysts reading Bloomberg.