I would disagree. It is somewhat site dependant but by offering dedicated networked EV chargers you might often get more charging bang for your site electrical budget.
Take for example a motel with 30 rooms and parking spaces for. With your every third park at 15A which would have to be rated for 100% continuous draw that would be an additional site demand on 10x15A or 36kW.
This may tip a site over its current site limits and maybe they only have, say, 32A left it capacity designed for 100% draw.
Now say you have an integrated networked EV charging system. I am not sure what motel room AirCon loads are rated at for site designs but they will be less that 100%. But say the site has 8kW systems rated for maximum demand of 50%. You can now utilise any spare capacity not used by AirCon or other site loads that had a nominal rated capacity built into the site electrical design that might be unused. This might for example get you up over 40kW of supply you can use as long as it is demand limited when say the AirCon or other is not running at its full capacity. It will make a lot of sense in these situations to trade off of peak evening AirCon demand which has low overnight utilisation to trade for EV charging overnight.
This not only solves a costly electrical site upgrade buy also ongoing increased demand charges that are charged at the peak usage in an given month assuming the motel is large enough to hit this type of commerical power arrangement.
Tesla wall chargers at $750 I think now fit this requirement though I am not sure how much of a cut Tesla takes when you use their billing system of your paid networked AC charging. At $750 per charger and the potential for less electrical upgrades may well make this, or similar from another provider provides an attractive option for a limited electrical budget.