Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Energy Sector News

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

First of 62 Haliade-X turbines installed. The ship that went out to do the install left about 5 weeks ago. Not clear why it took so long. I saw a mention somewhere of bad weather, but there may be something else going on. It is the first install of a machine that size off the US coast, so hopefully just getting the process down.


Ok, maybe erecting an Eifell tower out in the Atlantic during a mini-hurricane presents some challenges :p

RT
 
Smoke from forest fires reason to exclude pollution data from routine observations:


Environmental political prisoners in Vietnam:

 
  • Informative
Reactions: petit_bateau
That first article about exceptions to reporting under the Clean Air Act beggars belief. Local government can say the air is cleaner than it actually is, because “someone else’s” forest fire dirtied the air in their district?

What is the point of air quality monitoring if you then change the data? Monitoring is a passive activity, it’s not political. This is also a good example of how environmental issues make our political borders irrelevant and require cooperative action.
 
Reminds me of the Lithium HomeGrid Stack'd product, which is on the short list of products to put in my own home as soon as I can find the right installer.
Another possible option I went with if you want/need AC coupled is FranklinWH. Very similar to a Powerwall but with great support and availability.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2215.jpeg
    IMG_2215.jpeg
    776.2 KB · Views: 50
Seems Tesla lowered Megapack price:

Wartsilla adds EVE as additional supplier to CATL:

EU gas storage is 98% full, but current 98% is like 100% year ago and additional ~2% are stored in Ukraine
 
Believe it or not, battery-powered vehicles have been around since Victorian times – everything from private automobiles to taxis, ambulances and tricycles. We’ve got the photos to prove it

 
  • Like
Reactions: fhteagle
She tries to help them shift to a different mind-set: We’re living on the cusp of total societal transformation and can build a more abundant, more equal future. The fact is, she would’ve had to write a very different book 50 years ago.
Today, decoupling energy consumption from carbon emissions is no longer some impossible engineering problem, she writes, and “like beating swords into plowshares, we can imagine transforming all the artifacts of a fossil-fuel-powered culture into the ones necessary for a sustainable world.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: winfield100
Satellite imaging of methane leaks across the Permian basin, a vast geological feature at the heart of the US oil and gas drilling industry, show that sites in Texas have emitted double the amount of the gas than in New Mexico, per unit of production, since 2019.

 
  • Informative
Reactions: iPlug
Meanwhile, Kauai’s high percentage of renewable generation buffered customers from exorbitant price hikes. Its rates have returned to where they were pre-Ukraine invasion. By contrast, every island served by Hawaiian Electric suffered price hikes of 50% or more in the months after the Ukraine invasion. Retail prices on populous Oahu still sit 49% higher than they were in January 2021, according to state data.

“Unfortunately, Hawaiian Electric customers will remain vulnerable to global fossil fuel prices until the utility can achieve greater integration of renewables across its service territory,” Colón noted.

 
More pushback from the O&G sector of Alberta, via a complaint provincial government (paywalled).

“Tell the Feds,” says the Government of Alberta’s recent $8-million ad campaign opposing federal clean electricity rules. If you’re a resident of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario or Nova Scotia, you’ve likely heard or seen them.

Who could disagree with statements like “No one wants blackouts. What Canadians want is reliable and affordable power”? Nor does anyone want “to freeze in the dark.”

These messages seem sound, but they are grossly exaggerated if not outright false. Independent experts have already debunked the campaign’s central claims. With some effort and planning, the transition to a cleaner power grid could actually save Canadians hundreds of dollars in power bills annually, all while providing reliable and climate-friendly electricity.

But in this misinformation age, even the most engaged citizens will struggle to stay on top of the continuous need for fact-checking and claim-debunking. Instead, Canadians should consider a government’s policy track record as a handy shortcut – especially when that government wraps its arguments in feasibility, affordability and protecting the public purse. Alberta’s actual track record undermines each and every one of these arguments. (…)

(…) So of course Alberta’s Premier opposes federal clean electricity rules – and will oppose an oil and gas GHG emissions cap if and when it is announced. When a provincial government appears intent on picking up the tab on hundreds of billions of the sector’s cleanup liabilities, with the potential to double, triple or quadruple Alberta’s current debt of $80-billion, it’s no surprise that same government is unwilling to impose the costs associated with meaningful climate regulation – and will oppose such efforts from others.

Viewed this way, the “Tell the Feds” campaign isn’t about feasibility, affordability or reliability, but rather a thinly disguised attempt to enlist ordinary Canadians in Alberta’s unyielding service to the fossil fuel industry. But as year after year of extreme weather and fire seasons have made clear, climate inaction and delay come with their own significant – sometimes immeasurable – costs for the rest of us. Canadians would be justified in telling Alberta those are costs they’re no longer willing to bear.

 
Lauri Myllyvirta, a longtime China analyst now with the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, calculated that CO2 emissions from the world’s biggest national polluter are likely to fall next year and could then go into “structural decline”.

 
Cherry picking data…again…for more culture war crap.

This time, conflating resistance heating data to suggest heat pump data will be as expensive.

Now a slew of publications, including the rightwing Daily Caller, have reported that US households using electricity for heat this winter will pay hundreds of dollars more than those who use gas.

 
  • Like
Reactions: iPlug
Cherry picking data…again…for more culture war crap.

This time, conflating resistance heating data to suggest heat pump data will be as expensive.



Also it seems it does not compare heating energy fuel type against similar local households. The EIA link instead compares by "U.S. average household fuel expenditures".

The problem here is certain heating fuels are more common in different geographic regions that can have very different winter temperatures and hence large cost differences based on geography alone.

For example the heating oil is really just used in older homes in the Northeast, electric resistive heat is common in the South, and NG is common in the West.

The EIA should instead show costs of like-for-like households in different regions based on heating source and include heat pumps among NG, electric resistive, fuel oil, propane, etc. More importantly, reporters should report such data.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: navguy12