I stand by the example posted and raise you an accusation of anarcho-tyranny. It’s not the about the act, it’s who is involved and the American Citizen is the real loser in it all.
Ok then post the evidence that police arrested the person responsible and the Attorney for the District of Columbia appointed in 2017 who dropped the charges in 2018 was somehow under the control of the current administration. You make a lot of very far fetched claims. haha. This is next level though.
I didn’t get into the specifics of it but there’s no denying that some are more equal than others in the District of Criminals and other places where flunkie clowns are in charge of the “justice” system.
I stand by the example posted and raise you an accusation of anarcho-tyranny.
My BS detector just about caught on fire when I first heard that.
You don’t need 80K+ new bean counters to go after the top 3-4% of earners.
I seem to be missing something basic here. Shouldn’t people who don’t pay their taxes be forced to do so?
If you’re making enough money to live comfortably in a high inflation period (as optimistic as I can word it, frankly) one should value their freedom more than being able to deduct a business lunch at The Capital Grille.
Again, your information is wrong.
apnews.com
1. I would have done the same. Even though the information could be extrapolated, it was still against the anonymity requested by Elon to the government.
2. Comedians are supposed to be funny.
1. I would have done the same. Even though the information could be extrapolated, it was still against the anonymity requested by Elon to the government.
2. Was done against more than just Elon.
“Twitter accounts with check marks impersonated consumer brands Eli Lilly, PepsiCo and Nintendo, and public figures including Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, President Joe Biden and basketball player LeBron James. “
Twitter blue parody accounts flood the platform after new subscription service rollout
Twitter accounts with blue check marks under new Musk system impersonated brands and public figures including Eli Lilly, Nintendo and Joe Biden.www.usatoday.com
3. It’s his company. He can hire/fire ANYONE he wants. And if he feels those people are slowing down his progress to right the ship, look out! Especially when time is of the essence.
4. Many did more than report on it. They linked to other locations for that information. But others were unfairly included in that. Quickly reverted.
Elon screws up at times but at least he does change course when needed quite often. Sometimes I wish he would think a bit longer before reacting but it’s easy for me to armchair quarterback without knowing all the details.
I was simply replying to the 4 points made by the previous poster. Not that they were “woke” or not.
Irrelevant. The law requires that the information be transmitted. Elon knows the law. That said, there are ways to get anonymity within the bounds of the law (the planes are required to transmit their ICAO hex ID, type, position, speed, etc., once every second). This is for safety reasons as other planes can pick up this data and use it to send alerts to pilots of impending mid-air collisions. But they are NOT required to transmit their passenger manifests. If Elon is too stupid to figure out how to get anonymity, then he should talk to Tim Cook or Bernard Arnault, who have both figured it out.
While this is true, it generally wasn't a problem until Elon made a mockery of the blue check mark by allowing anyone to buy it for $8.2. Was done against more than just Elon.
“Twitter accounts with check marks impersonated consumer brands Eli Lilly, PepsiCo and Nintendo, and public figures including Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake, President Joe Biden and basketball player LeBron James. “
Twitter blue parody accounts flood the platform after new subscription service rollout
Twitter accounts with blue check marks under new Musk system impersonated brands and public figures including Eli Lilly, Nintendo and Joe Biden.www.usatoday.com
I wasn't commenting on whether this was legal or not. Clearly it is legal, as he owns the company. I was commenting on this:
That was your statement, not Elon's. But the problems you pointed out are all things Elon does or advocates. Legal? Yes. But you never claimed that they were illegal, just that they were problems. And I agree.
So? Public data, transmitted on the public airwaves. If I go driving on the road past your house, I do not have any recourse if you set up a camera that reads license plates and posts on a website whenever my vehicle goes by your house. I have no expectation of privacy in public places, and all cars are required to have license plates on them. The light waves that reflect off of said license plate and are picked up by cameras on public property, or on private property that you own, are also public information. So if you're going to post the date and time of every license plate of every car that drives by, that's legal, and there's nothing I can do to stop you. That said, I can mask my identity by not ever driving the same vehicle twice, which meets the legal requirement of having a license plate on the car but since the plate doesn't identify the occupants, you wouldn't know which car had me in it. There is also no expectation of privacy when transmitting data on the public airwaves, and planes are required to transmit their data. But NOT their passenger manifests, as I explained earlier.
Your BS detector misses a lot.I stand by the example posted and raise you an accusation of anarcho-tyranny. It’s not the about the act, it’s who is involved and the American Citizen is the real loser in it all.
My BS detector just about caught on fire when I first heard that.
