Wait... lemme... lemme just... hold on a minute. Are you saying he bought Twitter for $44b and is just PRETENDING to be QAnon-adjacent... so he can sell CTs in Texas?
Didn’t see that coming. 4D chess for real!
Not all all, seriously. My point is the motivations for changing political outlook or disclosing even without change, usually have complex dynamics. Some of that is conveniently coincidental. The Twitter activity undoubtedly is consciously connected to getting more activity on the platform, whether he actually believes the Fauci stuff, for example, or not.
With Texas now crucial to SpaceX, the Boring Company, Tesla and even Neuralink there are several coincident issues:
-quite hostile reactions in California, explicitly including lawsuit exposure.
-Texas is easy for permitting, business activity;
-Texas has low taxes;
-Most of this is located around Austin, among the most liberal, well educated and enthusiastic environments in the State, also the State Capitol.
-The Texas legislature and State Government are pleased to observe a 'kindred spirit'
So, it isn't about just direct sales but about being on the correct side of regulatory pressure. Generating more Twitter activity is correlated with user view affirmation.
There are serious downsides too. I'm trying to understand how influences work.