Freudianly
Banned
It is incredible how expectation get recalibrated. As Louis C.K. said, "Everything is amazing, and nobody's happy."
Last edited by a moderator:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is incredible how expectation get recalibrated. As Louis C.K. said, "Everything is amazing, and nobody's happy."
+1 It would definitely be nice to have support for waypoints along a given route. Until then, a workaround would be to manually record the results for the whole trip (start -> destination) and use the navigation computer for each of the waypoints.
Well now I do....What is amazing is the enormously high expectations we all have of Tesla vehicles vs. ICE cars. It's like some of us want the darn Model S to become a transformer or something.
He didn't say free superchargers for businesses AFAIK he said free charging equipment for businesses. As in if a business wants charging Tesla will send a HPWC for free to be installed at the location as destination charging not supercharging.
Just to state my opinion on this news released today, it looks like another "very nice" upgrade. Not earth-shattering, not revolutionary, but a lot better than a minor streamlining or reworking. It's going to be a very nice addition. There have been several of these very nice upgrades over the past year, and I think if they continue at this rate it's going to result in an unassailable advantage for Tesla.
It'll be great to live in San Diego and say to the car "I'd like to drive to Quebec without spending a penny on fuel. Where do I go?" and the car will work it out for you.
Or... Madrid to Moscow. Or... Lijiang to Harbin. etc. etc.
When the Model 3 hits, and people are driving long distances for free... it's going to make life for gasoline car makers pretty difficult.
Safety and laws aside.... Arriving at the supercharger with "close to zero without going under" is about as time efficient as you can get. Pairing that with always charging the bottom 2/3 of the battery rather than the top 2/3 means you'll have faster charge times per kWh as well.And if they had given everybody more range, they'd just go faster. A friend of mine drives 100 mph (just because he can, I guess) just so he arrives at the SC before he hits zero. If he had more range, he'd try for 105. Everything I read on this forum, people want more range so they can drive even further over the speed limit. Must. Get. There. Faster.
I know not everyone is like that, but when I have lots of range, I drive faster, too. When jumping from charger to distant charger, I'm in the slow lane.
Safety and laws aside.... Arriving at the supercharger with "close to zero without going under" is about as time efficient as you can get. Pairing that with always charging the bottom 2/3 of the battery rather than the top 2/3 means you'll have faster charge times per kWh as well.
Fantastic news overall.
Exactly what the saner heads here (sorry) predicted and even a little outlook on Firmware 7.0.
10 days until 6.2 gets released, so that is (in Elon Time) mid to late April. Not bad, not bad.
Just to state my opinion on this news released today, it looks like another "very nice" upgrade. Not earth-shattering, not revolutionary, but a lot better than a minor streamlining or reworking. It's going to be a very nice addition. There have been several of these very nice upgrades over the past year, and I think if they continue at this rate it's going to result in an unassailable advantage for Tesla.
It'll be great to live in San Diego and say to the car "I'd like to drive to Quebec without spending a penny on fuel. Where do I go?" and the car will work it out for you.
Or... Madrid to Moscow. Or... Lijiang to Harbin. etc. etc.
When the Model 3 hits, and people are driving long distances for free... it's going to make life for gasoline car makers pretty difficult.
Would love to be able to use the trip planning feature without being in the car. Plan out the trip on the Tesla website beforehand, and if logged into the site, it would be aware of my car's location/type/SOC etc just as if I were sitting in the driver's seat.
Perhaps it's being discussed already in another thread but I found this part interesting.From the R&T live blog:
Regarding the claim that Auto Steering can drive from San Francisco to Seattle: "It's technically capable of going from parking lot to parking lot. But we won't be enabling that for users with this hardware suite because we don't think it's going to be safe in neighborhoods where there's no lane markings and kids playing in the street. It will only be enabled if you're on a highway or major road."
Most people do not seem to realize that the 6.2 firmware is a checkmate move by Elon.
Check was the supercharger network.
Pure genius.
The supercharger times displayed on the screenshots distributed as press material are a lot longer than the touted "half charge in 20 min" or "stop for a quick break and go". I wonder what kind of battery reserve margins the trip software will bake into the route plan.
It does seem that the 6.2 Driver Assistance updates have been somewhat drowned out by the nav stuff. With 6.2 Model S will have:
- Adaptive cruise
- Auto high beam
- Collision detection
- Emergency braking
- Blind spot detection
So what's missing compared to other manufacturers?
- Lane keep assistance
- Semi-automonous parking
- HUD
Anything else I'm missing that's found across multiple manufacturers? Or is 6.2 the "No More Excuses" release?
The supercharger times displayed on the screenshots distributed as press material are a lot longer than the touted "half charge in 20 min" or "stop for a quick break and go". I wonder what kind of battery reserve margins the trip software will bake into the route plan.
Perhaps it's being discussed already in another thread but I found this part interesting.
Elon made a comment soon after the D announcement along the lines of "no significant hardware advances for 2 years" which, to me, implied that at the very least the sensor suite in place at the D announcement would be "enough" for at least 2 years of firmware advances in the "auto pilot feature set".
This new quote (and related discussion I've seen from live blogging of the press event) suggests that the 10-50mph "neighborhoods with children around" functionality either [a] won't be available for at least two years or will require new hardware. If that would contract the previous statement.
Perhaps I'm missing something or misunderstanding.