I don't think anyone is asking for free upgrades or being unreasonable.
The issue raised is that some here have heard rumours that is happening, and we have seen definitive proof of it happening in the past. I am certainly not suggesting that is the case with the OP of this thread, but it has happened (and will continue to happen, such is human nature).
Consumer laws require companies to deliver the product specified,it's as simple as that.
I am not lawyer, but here is the state of Hong Kong consumer laws as described by one:
The Duty Lawyer Service : Tel-Law Scheme : Administration and constitutional law
Perhaps I am coming from the 'seller' rather than the 'purchaser' side, but given that what is known is known before delivery (and payment), I think it would be hard to ask for more than a cancellation of the sale (or something equivalent). Regardless of the law, as others have said, perhaps it is best to just wait and see what happens. Certainly in six months time more will be known and the cars will be delivered for new purchasers faster then. No one is forcing anyone to buy the car now.
Sure, we can demand Tesla delivers 3rd row seats and web browsers, but given that they are seemingly illegal in Hong Kong, I really don't see it happening.
The good news, for web browser in particular, is that with the Tesla model, software features can be added later (should the law be changed or re-interpreted). We saw that with the roadster (which originally in HK didn't have brake lights on regen, but was later permitted).
I'm also not so sure I see a burning spark in any HK Tesla employee that is anything different to the same poor HK service you get anywhere. All of the developments and changes in HK specs have been revealed on these forums first, before any official announcement.
My opinion of Tesla employees seems very different from yours and extremely positive. They have been looking after my car for the past three years, and have always handled it with care and professionalism. My car recently came up for yearly service - while I was away on holiday they came to my office, picked up the key, valet drove it away, serviced it perfectly, then delivered it back so it was shiny polished and ready on my return. From talking to other roadster owners, my experience here is not unique. Every Tesla HK employee I speak to has a passion for the company and the product. Compare with Nissan who we called yesterday for a simple fix to a door trim (so that the car thinks the door is open and undrive-able), and they have asked us to wait 3 weeks for an appointment (or 6 if we want a weekend).
What has been pre-revealed on these forums are rumours. Please don't take them as more than that, or blame Tesla for not adhering to them.
Where is the communication to the buyers? How hard is it for Tesla HK to keep people up to date?
Now, something we can agree on. I also fail to understand why Tesla won't communicate more with all of us. Just a monthly email localised for markets that have not had deliveries start yet would be a great comfort. I am not asking for promises - just tell us what they are working on and some of the reasons it is not so easy.
Once again, the "if you don't like it , cancel" attitude is simply wrong. People expect Tesla to deliver what they promised. Clearly cyrushk wants the car with the features advertised and communicated to him by employees, this is reasonable and the minimum standard required by law and expected by customers.
Let's try to put ourselves in Tesla's shoes here. Does anyone here really think that Tesla want to fail in Hong Kong? That they want to go to the hassle of removing the web browser rather than leaving it in? That they are deliberately not supporting the 13A public sockets at launch so as to make life as difficult for owners as possible? That Elon doesn't want our kids to sit on those third row seats - the safest seats in the safest sedan on the roads?
Every change to the car specification is more work for them. It is work to remove a feature as it is to add it. The
only advantage to them would be if they could save money, but I think they have shown what they think of that by their fair pricing policy (as well as things like the 0% surcharge for signatures). They could have taken advantage of the 0% FRT situation, but they didn't (Nissan example again - the leaf is US$54k vs somewhere around US$30k in USA - apples to apples comparison - and also doesn't have carwings telemetry, GPS or charge locations here in HK). What we have ended up with in the Model S is a truly price-competitive vehicle, in its segment of the market.
To me, the only reason to buy a high-end BMW / Mercedes / Audi here now is if you can't charge the car. But, that is a truly hard problem to solve, and I have yet to see a country or manufacturer that has even come close to a solution.
The driving goal of Tesla is to drive the world to a sustainable future in transportation, and I see that in every interaction I have with the company. It is a goal I share with them, although I am not affiliated with the company in any way. I want my kids to grow up in a world where they can walk down the street without being poisoned by the pollution. So, every time I see one of these hiccups raised on that path (3rd row seats, charging, browser, google maps, etc), I groan. But, I'm also willing to give Tesla the benefit of the doubt, without the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.