[..] if it weren't for Tesla we'd still be in the ICE age.
That's brilliant.
The ICE age - another era...
- - - Updated - - -
There's a double-whammy of a contractor with limited Canadian experience and Tesla having less incentive to push Canadian sales.
No ZEV credits to be earned by Tesla in any province. Only two provinces offering cash rebates on EV purchases. Canada possibly being the only country in the G20 with no Federal-level EV incentives.
I don't agree with this argument.
Are there any ZEV credits to be earned by Tesla in most states?
The existence of an incentive is irrelevant - Tesla makes the same profit selling a car in Canada as they do in the United States, regardless of incentives. Tesla doesn't get any money from the incentive, the consumer does. The only effect the incentive has on the manufacturer is that it makes it easier to sell the car.
It's not even clear to me that there are fewer Teslas per capita in Canada than in the United States. I'd love to see the figures. Anyways, from Tesla's perspective, I think it's more like California vs everywhere else: the population density, and sales (I will bet) are much higher in California than everywhere else. Not surprising, then, that the Supercharger network is densest in California.
I am tired of hearing excuses of the form "Canada is less dense" - well, yes, if you include the frigging arctic, but 99.8% of Canadians don't live in the arctic. (It's also not a very vibrant car market, given the lack of roads and all). The population density in the "Windsor to Quebec" corridor beats anything across the middle of the United States. Yet where has Tesla most recently installed Superchargers? In Kansas. To get from Denver to Kansas City (970 km). Tell me what the population and traffic density on that corridor is compared to Windsor-Quebec (1155 km). The "corridor" in Canada is said to have 18 million people, whereas there's only roughly 8 million in all of Colorado and Kansas.