Very well may be. That was the only reference to that P/N I could find denoting what version of pack it was.108X P/N is a V3. I've not heard of a V4, either.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very well may be. That was the only reference to that P/N I could find denoting what version of pack it was.108X P/N is a V3. I've not heard of a V4, either.
I'm interested in the "Flex pack" designation that was mentioned. I'd like to know more about that. If it truly is a different pack than a "standard" V3, maybe the chemistry is back to the 85 pack chemistry.
Yep, the avatar says 90 and I think that is what for the most part anyway the car thinks it is. I did do some quick wide open throttle pushes on the way home and the display indicated ~320kW of draw during those times which is in line with where it was before and we'll over what a straight RWD 85 or 90 would pull.
I am in Raleigh so maybe if I can find time I will make a road trip to your shop @wk057. Maybe you can see what they did.
Battery is a 1088790-00-A if that helps at all.
I haven't been able to find any numbers for that particular pack, but if it's a v3 then I would imagine that it be in line with a non ludacris 90 pack. I still need to get a diag cable built so that I can see what it is really pulling at it's max in the current config.Flex packs were introduced shortly after Tesla began producing dual motors. It just relates to the pack enclosure and means it will work in either a dual or RWD vehicle.
@tyson what is the maximum current draw supported?
I agree and will see what they say.If this is going to become a norm, I think those of you who got this "upgrade" should pass a long a suggestion to Tesla to update the software to give you guys a P90 badge in the UI and on the app.
It really doesn't take much effort on their part to update a few values...
I believe the Q versions are non-performance, performance versions are P revision.For sure I don't have any sources for this, but this is what Telsa claims, and what EM often repeats. Don't take my word for it . If it isn't true, then I'm glad we're all still covered for a number of years. By then they'll surely have improved the drive unit reliability.
From what I heard the Q type revision drive units are more reliable and durable than the previous versions. I heard of people with 7 DU replacements, once the Q revision came in all wes smooth afterwards. My car had replacements at 15000km and 145000km, so that previous one (not a Q version) went on for 130000km.
Tesla President of sales and service leaves, Elon Musk takes over his responsibilities
Guess Jon won't be able to help out now....
Where did you read that 75 pack got replaced by A pack (you mean A as in 85 kWh A?)? Sounds like a huge performance improvement going from 350 to 400 VoltI have read several other posts on here where others with failed 75/85 packs have been getting 2017 manufactured A packs as replacements as well.