So, after reading all of this and the many threads in which people discuss these fan and/or PEM failures here's what I'm thinking. I can reconcile the fact that they didn't just roll out these new fans to everyone for free. I don't like it, but I can accept it. What I am having trouble being ok with, is how in the world does any Roadster go through an annual service since 2013 when this was clearly a known issue without the service team recommending the fan upgrade at full retail cost to the customer?! It would have been a revenue opportunity for them and it could have saved many customers (perhaps myself) from spending upwards of $10k on a PEM replacement.
Knowing that they did the annual service on 543 a week before this failure and gave it a clean bill of health with the old fan system, is it fair to say that there is at least some shared responsibility if they determine that the lack of adequate cooling contributed to the overheating and failure? I know it's easy to say in hindsight but I am very much a "better safe than sorry" type of person so I am 100% certain I would have paid just about whatever they asked for the new fans if it were recommended to me.
Knowing that they did the annual service on 543 a week before this failure and gave it a clean bill of health with the old fan system, is it fair to say that there is at least some shared responsibility if they determine that the lack of adequate cooling contributed to the overheating and failure? I know it's easy to say in hindsight but I am very much a "better safe than sorry" type of person so I am 100% certain I would have paid just about whatever they asked for the new fans if it were recommended to me.